Teams

Belmont Kelly

2025 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday 4.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 4.42 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-24vs LaForsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesEmily Edens / Courtney Greiner vs Mary Davis / Ashley Hart6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAbigail Dryden / Allyson Brand vs Suzanne Spiller / Lauren Palmer1-6, 4-6
2025-07-22vs LaForsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCourtney Greiner / Margie Ray vs Beth Gardner / Mary Davis6-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesErin Decker / Michelle Wycinsky vs Erin Waters / Kim Alley6-2, 6-2
2025-07-19vs LaForsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCourtney Greiner / Margie Ray vs Karolyn Hall / Tracy Buzzeo4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMichelle Wycinsky / Erin Decker vs Kim Alley / Robin Nester6-1, 6-1
2025-07-13vs LaForsLost 02
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Wallace / Courtney Greiner vs Suzanne Spiller / Beth Gardner3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Wycinsky / Carol Gregory vs Laura Lafors / Katherine Carnohan4-6, 2-6
2025-07-10vs LaForsLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Wycinsky / Carol Gregory vs Suzanne Spiller / Joyce Steed6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCary Moore / Courtney Greiner vs Laura Lafors / Karolyn Hall1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAbigail Dryden / Leslie Altaffer vs Jill Campbell / Robin Nester6-4, 6-2
2025-07-05vs LaForsWon 10
W#2 DoublesMegan Alwine / Leslie Altaffer vs Laura Lafors / Kim Alley6-2, 6-3
2025-06-17vs LaForsLost 02
L#1 DoublesMegan Alwine / Elizabeth Kelly vs Karolyn Hall / Erin Waters6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAllyson Brand / Margie Ray vs Ashley Hart / Suzanne Spiller7-6, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.10 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Leslie Altaffer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.31
Megan Alwine
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.28
Elizabeth Kelly
published 4.5
Allyson Brand
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Emily Edens
published 4.5
4.25
Cary Moore
published 4.5
4.23
Margie Ray
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.14
Erin Decker
published 4.5
4.13
Courtney Greiner
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.04
Michelle Wycinsky
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.96
Abigail Dryden
published 4
3.89
Carol Gregory
published 4.5
3.88
Brigitte Fanelli
published 4
3.67
Lauren Jones
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Kelly + Megan Alwine404 matchesnot enough data
Courtney Greiner + Margie Ray123 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Altaffer + Megan Alwine303 matchesnot enough data
Allyson Brand + Margie Ray123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Leslie Altaffer
72W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
4.38
4.5
Megan Alwine
111W–60L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Elizabeth Kelly
35W–23L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Allyson Brand
25W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Emily Edens
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Cary Moore
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Margie Ray
93W–62L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Erin Decker
14W–11L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
4.14
4.5
Courtney Greiner
117W–118L career · 5 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
4.13
4.5
Michelle Wycinsky
120W–74L career · 4 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
4.04
4
Abigail Dryden
11W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.96
4.5
Carol Gregory
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
3.89
4
Brigitte Fanelli
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.88
Lauren Jones
19W–8L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.