Teams

IE-Vista Murrieta-Boland

2026 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - IE · IE Women 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings2 teams · IE Women 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IE-Vista Murrieta-Boland000000
2IE-Canyon Crest-Hebert000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
3.77
Lillian Dang
published
3.74
Lori Swingle
published 4
3.68
Laila Gomulka
published
3.65
3.65
Harriet Isaac
published 4
3.61
Jennifer Kries
published 4
3.33
Alexandra Sumarli
published 3.5
3.20
Cindy Ziqing Lin
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Harriet Isaac + Jennifer Kries134 matchesnot enough data
Susan Campbell-Boland + Jennifer Kries123 matchesnot enough data
Susan Campbell-Boland + Lori Swingle123 matchesnot enough data
Laila Gomulka + Lori Swingle213 matchesnot enough data
Lillian Dang + Cindy Ziqing Lin123 matchesnot enough data
Lori Swingle + Alexandra Sumarli123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Charanya Sivaraman
5W–4L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.84
Lillian Dang
2W–6L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Lori Swingle
76W–54L career · no lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.74
Laila Gomulka
8W–7L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
Susan Campbell-Boland
6W–9L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Harriet Isaac
13W–30L career · no lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Jennifer Kries
102W–95L career · no lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.61
3.5
Alexandra Sumarli
12W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Cindy Ziqing Lin
2W–5L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.