Teams

Co.Hicks18A

2025 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-25vs Da.Boone18AWon 30
W#1 DoublesCourtney Hicks / Kaitlyn Floyd vs Joey Elphick / Amy Holman6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSydney Beasley vs Megan Wilkinson6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMolly Gorham / Blair Cobb vs Danielle Boone / Devany Ayers7-6, 6-2
2025-04-18vs Je.Tyndall18ALost 01
L#1 DoublesMaeve Gardner / Tucker Andrews vs Carrie Martinelli / Molly Chaffee4-6, 1-6
2025-03-28vs Ka.Manooch18ALost 01
L#1 DoublesTucker Andrews / Sarah Hoverstad vs Alicia Gilleskie / Drewry Carter3-6, 6-7
2025-03-21vs Je.Jones18ALost 01
L#1 SinglesTucker Andrews vs Lisa Merritt6-0, 6-7, 0-1
2025-03-14vs Da.Boone18AWon 10
W#2 DoublesTucker Andrews / Mary Margaret Ross vs Nina Thomas / Joey Elphick6-0, 6-1
2025-03-07vs Je.Tyndall18ALost 01
L#1 DoublesTucker Andrews / Jessica Barringer vs Molly Chaffee / ROBIN STEWART3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.42 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Sydney Beasley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.66
Mary Margaret Ross
published
2.51
Jessica Barringer
published
2.49
Greyson McGrail
published
2.46
Blair Cobb
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.40
Courtney Hicks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.37
Tucker Andrews
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Cameron Leonard
published 2.5
2.17
Maeve Gardner
published
2.10
Sarah Hoverstad
published
2.05
Anna Kuruc
published 2.5
Kaitlyn Floyd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Molly Gorham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Barringer + Mary Margaret Ross5261% games+10.9% vs expected
Courtney Hicks + Tucker Andrews303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sydney Beasley
16W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Mary Margaret Ross
16W–13L career · no lines in 2025
0%12%88%
2.66
Jessica Barringer
15W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%48%52%
2.51
Greyson McGrail
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%53%47%
2.49
2.5
Blair Cobb
12W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
0%60%40%
2.46
2.5
Courtney Hicks
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%76%24%
2.40
2.5
Tucker Andrews
44W–60L career · 9 lines in 2025
0%83%17%
2.37
2.5
Cameron Leonard
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Maeve Gardner
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
Sarah Hoverstad
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.10
2.5
Anna Kuruc
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Kaitlyn Floyd
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Molly Gorham
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.