Teams

UPTA40C/Farmer/Butler Springs

2025 UPTA Combo 40 & Over - SC · 40+ Combo Women - 6.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-09-18vs UPTA40C/Curin/BrookstoneWon 21
W#1 DoublesFrancine Holmes / Emily Gunderson vs Julie Gibson / Rebecca Sandborg6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJane Argo / Andrea Scoggins vs Paige Botts / Annette Curin4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Nessmith / Dorothy Farmer vs Jenna Spencer / Lee Ann Wilson6-3, 7-5
2025-09-11vs UPTA40C/Gailey/ThornbladeLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Nessmith / Judy Niver vs Jill Seeley / Brantley Goforth1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBessie Gonzalez / Susan McClure vs Erica Kelly / Carlin Turner4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJane Argo / Erin Benfield vs Angela Joffe / Jamie Flaherty2-6, 1-6
2025-08-28vs UPTA40C/Branham/ACACLost 12
W#1 DoublesAndrea Scoggins / Susan McClure vs Cindy Gitlitz / Maria Miller5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBessie Gonzalez / Emily Gunderson vs Tina Underwood / Anne Flink4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Nessmith / Tammy Rodgers vs Betty Ann Stinchcomb / Julie Branham3-6, 3-6
2025-08-27vs UPTA40C/Ellison/GCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndrea Scoggins / Jane Argo vs Andrea Phillips / Erin Piepkow2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Nessmith / Judy Niver vs Amanda Jones / Sherwood Cobb0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesEmily Gunderson / Lonna Farr vs Lauren Demosthenes / Whitney Blum7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-08-21vs UPTA40C/Knight/RiverWalkLost 12
W#1 DoublesFrancine Holmes / Lonna Farr vs Bethany Pratt / Lara Knight6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBessie Gonzalez / Erin Benfield vs Stacey Thomas / Jennifer Aughtry3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMarnie Cree / Maria Batista vs Maryanne Spivey / Lora Henderson4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40+ Combo Women - 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Andrea Scoggins
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.10
Francine Holmes
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.07
Susan McClure
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Bessie Gonzalez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Emily Gunderson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.02
Maria Batista
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Sharon Payne
published
3.01
Lisa Auger
published
2.84
Jennifer Nessmith
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.77
Lonna Farr
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.75
Jane Argo
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.71
Dorothy Farmer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Marnie Cree
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Tammy Rodgers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Judy Niver
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.60
Erin Benfield
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judy Niver + Dorothy Farmer6162% games−3.3% vs expected
Lonna Farr + Marnie Cree1739% games−16.2% vs expected
Lonna Farr + Susan McClure2341% gamesnot enough data
Andrea Scoggins + Jane Argo044 matchesnot enough data
Judy Niver + Sharon Payne134 matchesnot enough data
Sharon Payne + Lonna Farr134 matchesnot enough data
Sharon Payne + Jennifer Nessmith224 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Nessmith + Marnie Cree314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andrea Scoggins
17W–39L career · 5 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
Francine Holmes
144W–86L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.10
Susan McClure
34W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.07
3.5
Bessie Gonzalez
13W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
Emily Gunderson
39W–27L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
Maria Batista
39W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.02
Sharon Payne
16W–25L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.01
Lisa Auger
13W–14L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01
Jennifer Nessmith
20W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
2.84
Lonna Farr
18W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Jane Argo
5W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
2.75
Dorothy Farmer
17W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Marnie Cree
10W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Tammy Rodgers
7W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
Judy Niver
23W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.62
Erin Benfield
24W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%24%76%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.