Teams

Ostlund - Per-Shaped 7.0 MX ES25

2025 MIXED 18 & OVER EARLY START · 7.0 MX (SUN)

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-12-08vs Trettel - F25Lost 12
L#1 DoublesERIK LARSON / Beth Ann Sloan vs Bob Christiansen / Amy Hove3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBradford Richter / Jennifer Flanigan vs Christeen Paulison / Kresimir Skvorc7-6, 4-2
L#3 DoublesPer Ostlund / Jeanette Wood vs Anthony Trettel / Cheri Jacoby2-6, 2-6
2024-11-24vs Baisch/Auyoung: Oprah's Book ClubSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBradford Richter / Lauren Sporleder vs Ryan Baisch / Amy Lin6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMatthew Ruble / Jeanette Wood vs Colleen Finnegan / Hans Grong6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2024-11-03vs Toleu: Raqueteers 7.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesBradford Richter / Lauren Sporleder vs T.J. Majdecki / Gretchen Seifert4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Katz / ERIK LARSON vs Tyler Karabinus / Allie Witte3-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 MX (SUN) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
3.60
Bradford Richter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.57
Per Ostlund
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Wilfert Long
published
3.42
ERIK LARSON
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Matthew Ruble
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Beth Ann Sloan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Jennifer Flanigan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Lauren Sporleder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jeanette Wood
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kristin von Seggern
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Ann Sloan + Matthew Ruble2352% games−5.2% vs expected
Lauren Sporleder + Bradford Richter3255% gamesnot enough data
Lauren Sporleder + Matthew Ruble314 matchesnot enough data
Kristin von Seggern + Matthew Ruble213 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Sporleder + Wilfert Long213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alexis Siegel-Carlson
26W–41L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Bradford Richter
29W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.60
Per Ostlund
14W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
Wilfert Long
17W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
ERIK LARSON
14W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Matthew Ruble
42W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Beth Ann Sloan
19W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Jennifer Flanigan
18W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Lauren Sporleder
21W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Jeanette Wood
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristin von Seggern
16W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.