Teams

May, Bri

2025 Adult 18 & Over-JXN · Women 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.17 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-07vs Watson, Lee AnneWon 21
L#1 DoublesCaroline King Haynes / Brandi Hyatt vs Rachel Watson / Carrie Rayborn1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMolly Blakeney / Lyndsie North vs Lee Anne Watson / Shelley White6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLindsey Shukla / Cameron Martin vs Sonya Covey / Jennifer Tripoli6-1, 6-3
2025-03-31vs Resch, AllynSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLeigh Anne Coleman / Martha Maxey vs Allyn Resch / Dana Germany6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth May / Laurie Mohon vs Mary Kennedy Hand / Katie Bumgarner6-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesCaroline King Haynes vs Linda Kellar2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLeigh Blaylock / Cameron Martin vs Amber Austin / Rhyan Plumlee4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-03-24vs Sullivan, AshleyWon 40
W#1 DoublesLeigh Anne Coleman / Kristin Odom vs Stephanie McKnatt / Virginia Britt6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMolly Blakeney / Cameron Martin vs Karenna Tinnion / Logan Holt6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesBrandi Hyatt vs Shelby Martin6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLindsey Shukla / Leigh Blaylock vs Allison Sims / Tracy Roan7-6, 6-1
2025-03-17vs Coins, JimmieSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLeigh Anne Coleman / Brandi Hyatt vs Erika Andrews / Natalie Holmes6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLyndsie North / Martha Maxey vs Erica Craft / Jeana Swan6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 SinglesBonnie Wester vs Tonyatta Hairston6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesLindsey Shukla / Rebecca Dukes vs Tina Smith / Tori McCray6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-03-03vs Pettis, ElizabethWon 50
W#1 DoublesLeigh Anne Coleman / Martha Maxey vs Kelsey Jones / Valerie Prado6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesBrandi Hyatt vs Colby Jordan6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth May / Molly Blakeney vs Cosby Parker / Clara Hammett6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesCaroline King Haynes vs Tammie Stringer6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLindsey Shukla / Laurie Mohon vs Jeanie Malouf / Johnna Valentine6-2, 6-3
2025-02-24vs King, ChaseLost 13
L#1 DoublesMolly Blakeney / Caroline King Haynes vs Whitney Mays / Danielle David4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBrandi Hyatt / Kristin Odom vs Pam Leo / Theresa Davis6-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesLyndsie North vs Beth Noland1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCameron Martin / Martha Maxey vs Chase King / Jill Webb3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-02-17vs Smith, AutumnLost 05
L#1 DoublesCaroline King Haynes / Meg Edwards vs Lauren Hontzas / Brittany Myers1-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesBonnie Wester vs Martha Ann Thorne4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLyndsie North / Leigh Anne Coleman vs Ginny Bowden / Erica Stutzman7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesBrandi Hyatt vs Autumn Smith3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesElizabeth May / Cameron Martin vs Kathrynrose Kidd / Jordan Mitchell Walker1-6, 1-6
2025-02-03vs Turpin, LeahbethWon 30
W#1 DoublesCaroline King Haynes / Leigh Anne Coleman vs Kristin Hardy / Leahbeth Turpin6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesBonnie Wester vs Ashley Cole6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLindsey Shukla / Meg Edwards vs Jeanna Crowder / Natalie Hutto5-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · Women 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1King, Chase71301024264
2May, Bri62271331280
3Thomas, Shelby34142146323
4Cooper, Stephany34122349338
5Ball, Conner Beth25191634294
6Black, Eason25122348341
7Turpin, Leahbeth26112960421
8Pettis, Elizabeth1552551316

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Caroline King Haynes
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
Bonnie Wester
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.60
Lindsey Shukla
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.59
Brandi Hyatt
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Elizabeth May
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kristin Odom
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Laurie Mohon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Leigh Blaylock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lyndsie North
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Martha Maxey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Molly Blakeney
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Rebecca Dukes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caroline King Haynes
10W–20L career · 10 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.87
3
Bonnie Wester
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lindsey Shukla
20W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%23%77%
2.60
3
Brandi Hyatt
13W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.59
Elizabeth May
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristin Odom
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laurie Mohon
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leigh Blaylock
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lyndsie North
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Martha Maxey
3W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Molly Blakeney
7W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Dukes
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.