Teams

KF.Johnson

2024 CTRL Mixed 55 & Over · Mixed 55 & Over 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-07-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesKevin Fitzcharles / Makereta Fitzcharles vs Ron Jeffery / Legare Woods6-0, 6-4
2024-07-14vs KF.EvansWon 20
W#1 DoublesKevin Fitzcharles / Virginia Lewis vs Karon Mertens / David Sardinha6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesRoy Johnson / Lonnie Sroka vs John Jabusch / Stephanie Jabusch6-2, 7-6
2024-07-08Won 10
W#2 DoublesKevin Fitzcharles / Makereta Fitzcharles vs Ron Jeffery / Donna Gast6-3, 6-4
2024-06-25vs KF.EvansWon 10
W#2 DoublesRoy Johnson / Lonnie Sroka vs John Jabusch / Legare Woods6-4, 6-4
2024-06-09Won 10
W#3 DoublesKevin Fitzcharles / Makereta Fitzcharles vs Jeff Brown / Cherie Berger6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 55 & Over 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Debbie Powell
published 3.5
3.51
Donna Reiser
published 3.5
3.48
Kevin Fitzcharles
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Virginia Lewis
published
3.28
Makereta Fitzcharles
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Howard Lem
published 3.5
3.20
Nancy Haire
published
3.17
Lonnie Sroka
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Julie Tapp
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Roy Johnson
published
3.06
Marlene Fricano
published
William Pencola
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Fitzcharles + Makereta Fitzcharles12169% games+14.5% vs expected
Roy Johnson + Marlene Fricano033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Debbie Powell
39W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Donna Reiser
21W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Kevin Fitzcharles
92W–39L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.48
Virginia Lewis
28W–26L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Makereta Fitzcharles
48W–37L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Howard Lem
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Haire
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Lonnie Sroka
39W–100L career · 2 lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Julie Tapp
118W–134L career · 6 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.12
Roy Johnson
3W–10L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.07
Marlene Fricano
4W–12L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.06
William Pencola
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.