Teams

Battlefield Ball Busters Combo 6.5

2023 Fredericksburg Combo · Fredericksburg Combo 6.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.40 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-09-17vs TNT Combo 6.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesFrances Bouffard / Melissa Hutcheson vs Elizabeth Hazard / Tara O'Brien6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLori Huthoefer / Leslie Mcdonald vs Dorota Sipko / Judith Jobrack4-6, 1-6
2023-09-07vs Tiebreakers Combo 6.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Beckham / Frances Bouffard vs Liz Walsh / Kristina Pallen2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-08-27vs Tiebreakers Combo 6.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDebbie Kem / Tara Ford vs Liz Walsh / Kristina Pallen6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-07-30vs TNT Combo 6.5Won 20
W#2 DoublesLori Huthoefer / Kathryn Davis vs Dorota Sipko / Jean Calloway7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDebbie Kem / Frances Bouffard vs Elizabeth Hazard / Lisa Bartley6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fredericksburg Combo 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Nikki Hyldahl
published
3.30
Lori Huthoefer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Debbie Kem
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Melissa Hutcheson
published
3.06
Frances Bouffard
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.96
Carolyn Beckham
published 3.5
2.85
Susan Button
published
2.81
Tara Ford
published
2.81
Leslie Mcdonald
published
2.74
Jamie Mcneill
published 3
Kathryn Davis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Kem + Frances Bouffard9650% gamesnot enough data
Lori Huthoefer + Debbie Kem8551% gamesnot enough data
Lori Huthoefer + Frances Bouffard314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nikki Hyldahl
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Lori Huthoefer
264W–187L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Debbie Kem
233W–165L career · 2 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.12
Melissa Hutcheson
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Frances Bouffard
79W–103L career · 3 lines in 2023
32%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Carolyn Beckham
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
2.96
Susan Button
12W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
2.85
Tara Ford
20W–21L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
Leslie Mcdonald
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Jamie Mcneill
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
2.74
Kathryn Davis
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.