Teams

GSTL40/Leo/Prestwick

2025 Combo 40 & Over- GSTL · Adult MEN - 8.5

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-05vs GSTL40/Mitchell/StablesLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnthony Carmola / David Allen vs Paul Hendrix / Robert Horvath6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChris Hill / Jim Quinney vs Michael Mitchell / Thomas Cerasaro2-6, 3-6
2025-09-10vs GSTL40/Gardner/RLTCSplit 11
L#2 DoublesChris Hill / Jim Quinney vs Daniel Fedele / Daniel Francis6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDan Muntean / Anthony Carmola vs Matthew Hale / Max Alon4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-09-08vs GSTL40/Mitchell/StablesLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoe Leo / Nate Fata vs Paul Hendrix / Robert Cobb3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChris Hill / Robert Purvis vs Michael Mitchell / Thomas Cerasaro4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJames Hubbard / John Waybright vs Jay Drosieko / Chase McGill1-6, 2-6
2025-08-04vs GSTL40/Gardner/RLTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesWilliam Potter / Chris Hill vs Jon Koceja / Craig Berkey2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJonathan Acuff / Robert Purvis vs Jeff Kimbro / Max Alon5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJoe Leo / David Allen vs Daniel Francis / Daniel Fedele7-6, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult MEN - 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Anthony Carmola
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.89
William Potter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Dan Muntean
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Robert Purvis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Jim Quinney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Joe Leo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
James Hubbard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
John Waybright
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jonathan Acuff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nate Fata
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joe Leo + Jim Quinney123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anthony Carmola
19W–9L career · type D · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
4.25
William Potter
9W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Dan Muntean
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
Robert Purvis
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
Jim Quinney
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.66
Joe Leo
10W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
James Hubbard
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
John Waybright
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jonathan Acuff
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Nate Fata
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.