Teams

Croy-Goettel

2026 Iowa Tri-Level League · 3.5-4.0-4.5 Men (East)

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / IOWA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-27vs DiLeoLost 12
L#1 DoublesNoah Vint / Mark Steckel vs Thies Kolln / Dayton Stevens1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChris Miller / Quinn Robinson vs John Ottavi / James Moldenhauer2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBryan Goettel / Steve Armstrong vs Angelo Fonseca / Jake Flanders6-3, 6-3
2026-07-13vs DiLeoLost 03
L#1 DoublesNathan Williams / Adam Ernsting vs Brad DiLeo / Dayton Stevens2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSteven Nesteby / Mark Steckel vs Ryan Murphy / Pranav Puri1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSteve Armstrong / Bryan Goettel vs Daniel Huff / Nathan Harmon3-6, 3-6
2026-07-06vs DiLeoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAdam Ernsting / Nathan Williams vs Brad DiLeo / Thies Kolln0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBruce Croy / Chris Miller vs Daniel Huff / Kevin Wu6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2026-06-22vs DiLeoLost 02
L#1 DoublesAdam Ernsting / Mark Steckel vs Brad DiLeo / Anthony Forcucci2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJack VonKampen / Jeremy Hagan vs Daniel Huff / Kevin Wu1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5-4.0-4.5 Men (East)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DiLeo3193770
2Croy-Goettel133919123

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Quinn Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Ruitao Liu
published
3.71
Mark Steckel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.64
Adam Ernsting
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Nathan Williams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Bryan Goettel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Steve Armstrong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Steven Nesteby
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Bruce Croy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Jeremy Hagan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Quinn Robinson
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.87
Ruitao Liu
3W–8L career · no lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
3.76
Mark Steckel
27W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Adam Ernsting
3W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.64
Nathan Williams
5W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.60
3.5
Bryan Goettel
2W–8L career · type M · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
Steve Armstrong
12W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
Steven Nesteby
26W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Bruce Croy
3W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Jeremy Hagan
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.