Teams

LA - Shadow's Aces

2022 USTA Adult 40 & Over – LA · LA - Women 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-03-27vs LA - Victorious SecretWon 10
W#1 DoublesAli Laventhol / Paula Marbach vs Donna Sanders / Rebecca Prange6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-02-20vs LA-LLW-LATC-Milinda McNeelyLost 01
L#2 DoublesEliza Llobrera / Kimberly Toney vs Vicki Carrington / MARY WOODWARD3-6, 0-6
2022-02-06vs LA - Kiss My AceWon 10
W#1 DoublesAllison Langus / Ali Laventhol vs Virginia Takeuchi / Marie Roco6-2, 6-2
2022-01-30vs LA - Victorious SecretWon 10
W#1 DoublesAli Laventhol / Allison Langus vs Heidi Wettenhall / Ana Calleja6-1, 6-3
2022-01-16vs LA - Downtown AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesAli Laventhol / Susan Warner vs Janet Tongsuthi / Mindy Schiffman6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Paula Marbach
published
3.27
Susan Warner
published
3.26
Diane Quan
published 3.5
3.23
Ali Laventhol
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Allison Langus
published 3.5
3.09
Maria Starn
published
3.06
Katherine Ferguson
published
2.79
Eliza Llobrera
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Kimberly Toney
published
2.50
Patricia Francisco
published
MacHrie Carroll
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Starn + Katherine Ferguson1437% gamesnot enough data
Susan Warner + Allison Langus2347% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paula Marbach
18W–24L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Susan Warner
18W–21L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Diane Quan
6W–13L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Ali Laventhol
163W–119L career · 6 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Allison Langus
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
Maria Starn
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
Katherine Ferguson
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Eliza Llobrera
121W–89L career · 1 line in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
Kimberly Toney
10W–9L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
2.69
Patricia Francisco
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
2.50
MacHrie Carroll
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.