Teams

Cooper/Crofut/Le Bob’s

2022 ADULT 40 & OVER EARLY START · 3.5 MEN

12 players · average NTRP 3.64 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-12-15vs Edwardson/TrevinoLost 01
L#2 DoublesPhilip Jenkins / Scott Krohn vs Daniel Edwardson / Phillip Chase1-6, 5-7
2021-11-17vs WarnkeWon 10
W#3 DoublesPhilip Jenkins / Scott Krohn vs Kevin Warnke / Jeff Sternberg6-1, 6-2
2021-11-10vs Hassenstab - Fed ExpressWon 10
W#3 DoublesScott Krohn / Jeremy Bauer vs Steven Bauer / Mark Hassenstab6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Quang Nystrom
published
3.74
Bhavin Trivedi
published 4
3.72
Daniel Crouser
published 4
3.60
Paul Miksic
published
3.29
DAT HO
published 3.5
3.25
Chris Feile
published 3.5
Daniel Le
published 3.5
3.25
Barry Pinnock
published 3.5
3.17
Alan Steed
published 3.5
3.07
Tim Theobald
published
Jeremy Bauer
published
Scott Krohn
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bhavin Trivedi + Daniel Crouser303 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Crouser + Quang Nystrom213 matchesnot enough data
DAT HO + Chris Feile213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Quang Nystrom
27W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Bhavin Trivedi
17W–15L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Daniel Crouser
21W–28L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
Paul Miksic
26W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%23%77%
3.60
3.5
DAT HO
21W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Chris Feile
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Daniel Le
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Barry Pinnock
96W–92L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Alan Steed
6W–9L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Tim Theobald
40W–41L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
Jeremy Bauer
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Scott Krohn
81W–45L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.