Teams

CT Brown - Wilkinson

2024 Duval Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.40 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-25vs Julington Creek - CarrLost 01
L#1 DoublesJill Gray / Ezekiel Haigler vs Mary O'Dwyer / James ODwyer4-6, 2-6
2024-08-13vs JBTC - LombardoLost 01
L#3 DoublesEzekiel Haigler / Jill Gray vs Elizabeth Messina / M Delahunty3-6, 2-6
2024-08-09vs Duval/Fricke/18&Over7.0MXDLost 01
L#2 DoublesJill Gray / Eddie Kiep vs Polly Curole / Dan Calvo2-6, 4-6
2024-08-02vs Duval/Brink/18&Over7.0MxdLost 01
L#2 DoublesJill Gray / Luca Palombi vs Vanessa Holland / Vaughn Holland2-6, 3-6
2024-06-11vs Baymeadows - TorresLost 01
L#1 DoublesJill Gray / Luca Palombi vs Svetlana Mityul / Stephen Bennett3-6, 0-6
2024-06-07vs JBTC - HansenWon 10
W#3 DoublesJill Gray / Ezekiel Haigler vs Margaret Ivers / Brian Barry6-3, 6-2
2024-05-17vs Jax Golf - MerriamWon 10
W#1 DoublesJill Gray / Eddie Kiep vs Michelle Mendez / Spencer Merriam3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-05-03vs Hidden Hills - WoolfWon 10
W#1 DoublesJill Gray / Luca Palombi vs Natalie Deen / Shawn Stoddard6-3, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Eddie Kiep
published 3.5
3.52
Elisabethe Lucien
published 3.5
3.50
Ezekiel Haigler
published 3.5
3.39
Luca Palombi
published
3.36
Jill Gray
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.30
Paul Asuncion
published
3.25
Kelly Kuchera
published
George Bowles
published 3.5
3.13
Kim Costello
published
2.81
Cindy Wilkinson
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ezekiel Haigler + Elisabethe Lucien3248% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Eddie Kiep
20W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Elisabethe Lucien
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Ezekiel Haigler
10W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
Luca Palombi
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.39
Jill Gray
48W–60L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%86%13%
3.36
Paul Asuncion
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
Kelly Kuchera
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
George Bowles
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kim Costello
7W–15L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
3
Cindy Wilkinson
14W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
2.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.