Teams

Lady Acers

2021 Prince George's Tri-level · Tri-level Women 3.5,3.0,2.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.06 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-12-04vs SpenderellasLost 01
L#2 DoublesDonna Jones / Cortney Mukushi vs Tia Briscoe / Tracy Walls5-7, 4-6
2021-11-14vs SpenderellasLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnnette James / Cortney Mukushi vs Mia Dozier / Gwendolyn Vauss6-7, 3-6
2021-11-13vs Zimmerman JTCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesAngela Gallacher / Kristen LaCherra vs Hye-Soo Baek / Beverly Carpenter Nickens6-7, 5-2
2021-11-06vs SpenderellasLost 02
L#2 DoublesJacinda Johnson / Cortney Mukushi vs Tia Briscoe / Dana Trevas1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPamela Beard / Kristen LaCherra vs Martha Givan / Vicky White Hall0-6, 1-6
2021-10-30vs Different StrokesSplit 11
W#2 DoublesCortney Mukushi / Donna Jones vs Staci Steward / Beverly Taylor6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBrenda Barge / Angela Gallacher vs Patrice Shelburne / Natalie Walker5-7, 5-6
2021-10-24vs SpenderellasWon 20
W#2 DoublesJacinda Johnson / Cortney Mukushi vs Gwendolyn Vauss / Dana Trevas7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAngela Gallacher / Kristen LaCherra vs JENNIFER JOY / Sheane Robinson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-level Women 3.5,3.0,2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Jacinda Johnson
published 3.5
3.22
3.08
Rebecca Sellassie
published
2.97
Donna Jones
published 3
2.88
Karen Casey
published
2.88
Cortney Mukushi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Angela Gallacher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Bobbie Garrison
published 3
2.72
Elsie Stines
published 3
2.17
Kristen LaCherra
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
LaMia Jones
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela Gallacher + Cortney Mukushi033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jacinda Johnson
37W–14L career · no lines in 2021
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Denise Martin Barnes
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.22
Rebecca Sellassie
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.08
3
Donna Jones
21W–22L career · no lines in 2021
<1%58%42%
2.97
Karen Casey
9W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Cortney Mukushi
59W–85L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Angela Gallacher
48W–62L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Diana Williams Gibau
11W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Bobbie Garrison
7W–11L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Elsie Stines
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
2.72
2.5
Kristen LaCherra
23W–52L career · 3 lines in 2021
0%99%1%
2.17
LaMia Jones
27W–20L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.