Teams

UTC - Gonzalez

2026 LeeCharlotte Adult 18 & Over Fall ESL · 3.5 Women Thursday Eve

13 players · average NTRP 3.43 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-12-18vs Paseo - ZimmerWon 10
W#2 DoublesBeryl Gonzalez / Lori Summers vs Donna Douglass / Lisa DeLauder6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2025-12-11vs Babcock - BieniekLost 12
W#1 DoublesDenise Blough / Elizabeth Gaines vs Beth Workman / Karen Nuthals2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLucia Parvan vs Lori Bieniek4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesCindy Woods / Bettina Rubio vs Theresa Raker / Diana Barajas1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-12-04vs FMRC - BoydWon 10
W#2 DoublesLori Summers / Beryl Gonzalez vs Victoria Boyd / Joanne Reilly6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2025-11-20vs ESLFallWinner/UTC/MonahanLost 04
L#1 DoublesBeryl Gonzalez / Andrea Ramirez vs Emma May / Patricia Sareh3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesDenise Blough vs Raquel Teixeira4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMeagan Belger / Lori Summers vs Christina Candelario / Melissa Dorr0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Gaines / Regina Lookis vs Sherri Campbell / Ana Monahan1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-11-13vs Cypress Lake - ManiboSplit 11
L#1 SinglesLucia Parvan vs Kim Regets6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLori Summers / Beryl Gonzalez vs Victoria Manietta / Terri Destoppelaire6-3, 6-3
2025-11-06vs Gateway - BlackmonLost 02
L#1 DoublesLori Summers / Diann Cimring vs Amanda Pearson / Beth Sandman4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesBettina Rubio / Beryl Gonzalez vs Bonita Spight-Williams / Denise Vaccaro6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-10-23vs Paseo - ZimmerLost 02
L#2 DoublesRegina Lookis / Lori Summers vs Lisa DeLauder / Shelly Zimmer Wald6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDenise Blough / Lucia Parvan vs Rhonda Allen / Donna Douglass5-7, 0-6
2025-10-16vs Babcock - BieniekWon 40
W#1 DoublesMeagan Belger / Jenny Schultz vs Karen Moss / Shelley Marcus6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesLucia Parvan vs Gerriann Meandro6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Gaines / Regina Lookis vs Anne Mcdonald / Beth Workman6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAndrea Ramirez / Beryl Gonzalez vs Linda Hafner / Diana Barajas6-2, 6-1
2025-10-09vs FMRC - BoydLost 01
L#1 SinglesLucia Parvan vs Jeanette Witten7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-10-02vs ESLFallWinner/UTC/MonahanSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMeagan Belger / Annie McMurray vs Ana Monahan / Christina Candelario6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAndrea Ramirez vs Patricia Sareh0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesBeryl Gonzalez / Lori Summers vs Raquel Teixeira / Ann Boyd6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBettina Rubio / Denise Blough vs Sherri Campbell / Lisa Yeslow4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women Thursday Eve have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Kristine Johnston
published
3.52
Jenny Schultz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Annie McMurray
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.45
Meagan Belger
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.44
Lucia Parvan
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.43
Beryl Gonzalez
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Lori Summers
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
3.17
Diann Cimring
published 3.5
3.12
Regina Lookis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Elizabeth Gaines
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Denise Blough
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Andrea Ramirez
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.54
Bettina Rubio
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Regina Lookis + Elizabeth Gaines2353% gamesnot enough data
Beryl Gonzalez + Jenny Schultz033 matchesnot enough data
Beryl Gonzalez + Meagan Belger303 matchesnot enough data
Jenny Schultz + Meagan Belger213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristine Johnston
29W–30L career · no lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.55
Jenny Schultz
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Annie McMurray
6W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
Meagan Belger
21W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.45
Lucia Parvan
84W–89L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Beryl Gonzalez
17W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
3.43
Lori Summers
5W–11L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Diann Cimring
7W–8L career · no lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
Regina Lookis
33W–43L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Elizabeth Gaines
7W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Denise Blough
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Andrea Ramirez
10W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.98
3
Bettina Rubio
2W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.