Teams

A18 4.0W CC Garson

2026 NEOTA Adult 18 & Over Spring · NEOTA A18&O 4.0 Women Spring

17 players · average NTRP 3.57 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-05-01vs A18 4.0W NC McHolmLost 02
L#1 DoublesRosemary Cugliari / Meghan McCaulley vs Michelle Simmons / Andrea Brown1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesShelby Novick / Marnie Walcutt vs Rachel Harris / Renee Weaver2-6, 2-6
2026-04-24vs A18 4.0W TP GrayLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrooke Garson / Natalie Marotta vs Jamie Fox / Shelby Schaffner6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesColleen Rice vs Cora Shane1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Freund / Bridgette Palus vs Erin Gray / Erin Baginski1-6, 4-6
2026-04-10vs A18 4.0W WR PettySplit 11
W#1 DoublesRosemary Cugliari / Meghan McCaulley vs Melissa Durbin / Courtney Foster6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSusan Freund / Jodi Geduldig vs Stephanie Sneed / Sally Iuston4-6, 4-6
2026-03-27vs A18 4.0W SP AtienzaLost 12
L#1 DoublesAngela Dyer / Colleen Rice vs Alison Snook / Darcy Morris1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesCarla Greenwood vs Julie Trende2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNatalie Marotta / Marnie Walcutt vs Donna Reynolds / Amy Gray6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2026-03-20vs A18 4.0W GR DailyWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichelle Kuhn / Meghan McCaulley vs Melissa Owen / Trisha Kohut6-3, 7-5
L#1 SinglesNancy Sobecks vs Katarina Jovanovic2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJodi Geduldig / Darcie Hansen vs Denise Fehr / Christina Terzola7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-03-13vs A18 4.0W NC McHolmLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrooke Garson / Natalie Marotta vs Jane Pukys / Samantha Pukys6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesColleen Rice vs Kay McHolm3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAngela Dyer / Meghan McCaulley vs Molly White / Rachel Harris2-6, 1-6
2026-03-06vs A18 4.0W TP GrayLost 12
L#1 DoublesShelby Novick / Colleen Rice vs Hannah Lindesmith / Cora Shane1-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesMichelle Kuhn vs Brooke Kaylor6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBridgette Palus / Caroline Allin vs Erin Baginski / Jamie Hilborn4-6, 0-6
2026-02-27vs A18 4.0W WR PettyLost 02
L#1 DoublesJodi Geduldig / Carla Greenwood vs Elizabeth van Dyke / Miki Nakamoto3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Sobecks / Darcie Hansen vs Caterina Petty / Melissa Durbin3-6, 3-6
2026-02-22vs A18 4.0W GR DailyLost 12
L#1 DoublesRosemary Cugliari / Meghan McCaulley vs Christina Terzola / Katarina Jovanovic6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMichelle Kuhn vs Emma Deluca5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSara Schaefer / Caroline Allin vs Michelle Ross / Denise Fehr7-6, 6-4
2026-02-20vs A18 4.0W SP AtienzaWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrooke Garson / Natalie Marotta vs Cristina Atienza / Laurel Marsillo7-6, 6-1
W#1 SinglesColleen Rice vs Julie Trende2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJodi Geduldig / Bridgette Palus vs Susan Miller / MAGGIE GRAY1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · NEOTA A18&O 4.0 Women Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1A18 4.0W NC McHolm9122822221
2A18 4.0W MM Bruckner82191128247
3A18 4.0W GR Daily64181227233
4A18 4.0W PW Boeckman64151535284
5A18 4.0W TP Gray55171329247
6A18 4.0W WE Niehenke55151533268
7A18 4.0W CRC Ro55151535277
8A18 4.0W SP Atienza46141637279
9A18 4.0W AO Koziara37131739313
10A18 4.0W MV Miklowski37131740284
11A18 4.0W CC Garson37102043308
12A18 4.0W WR Petty3792146316

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Brooke Garson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Natalie Marotta
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.68
Michelle Kuhn
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.48
Rosemary Cugliari
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Colleen Rice
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.42
Meghan McCaulley
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.38
Caroline Allin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Jodi Geduldig
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.25
Shelby Novick
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Angela Dyer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Carla Greenwood
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Marnie Walcutt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Susan Freund
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.11
Nancy Sobecks
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.05
Sara Schaefer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.98
Bridgette Palus
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.94
Darcie Hansen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bridgette Palus + Brooke Garson5076% games+24.6% vs expected
Caroline Allin + Shelby Novick3260% games+14.8% vs expected
Angela Dyer + Brooke Garson5359% games+14.0% vs expected
Brooke Garson + Meghan McCaulley8157% games+12.3% vs expected
Sara Schaefer + Shelby Novick6164% games+8.0% vs expected
Colleen Rice + Shelby Novick4253% games+7.7% vs expected
Marnie Walcutt + Brooke Garson4548% games+7.5% vs expected
Brooke Garson + Shelby Novick7169% games+7.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brooke Garson
68W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
Natalie Marotta
108W–56L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
Michelle Kuhn
45W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68
Rosemary Cugliari
113W–81L career · 3 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Colleen Rice
39W–17L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.48
Meghan McCaulley
52W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Caroline Allin
56W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.38
Jodi Geduldig
50W–51L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
Shelby Novick
88W–39L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Angela Dyer
82W–68L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Carla Greenwood
30W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
Marnie Walcutt
81W–83L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
Susan Freund
100W–75L career · 5 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
Nancy Sobecks
46W–99L career · 4 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.11
Sara Schaefer
49W–39L career · 4 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.05
3.5
Bridgette Palus
44W–30L career · 6 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.98
3.5
Darcie Hansen
30W–61L career · 5 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.