Teams

STAC-Lovingfoss

2021 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Angela Keck
usually #2 Singles 38%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.22
Michelle O'Neil
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
Results6 ties
2021-06-19Won 10
W#2 DoublesHannah Adams / Angela Keck vs Kim Hedger / Tonya Schmid6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2021-06-13Won 20
W#2 DoublesAline Pereira / Angela Keck vs Penny Woodruff / Barbara Koslosky6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRachel Lovingfoss / Michelle O'Neil vs Dana Johnston / Anneke Berry6-3, 6-3
2021-06-06Split 11
L#2 DoublesMichelle O'Neil / Stacey Nelson vs April Victor / Jane Eidsaune6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAngela Keck / Aline Pereira vs Pam Butterfield / Nancy Lockett7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2021-05-22Won 10
W#2 DoublesStacey Nelson / Michelle O'Neil vs Krista Philbrick / Kim Wilson6-2, 6-4
2021-05-16Won 10
W#2 DoublesStacey Nelson / Michelle O'Neil vs Leel Scarlet Griot - * / Mollie Gosselin6-3, 6-4
2021-05-08Won 10
W#2 SinglesMichelle O'Neil vs Dora Karch6-3, 5-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Angela Keck
80W–104L career
0%99%0%
3.76
4
Michelle O'Neil
69W–73L career
95%5%0%
3.22

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.