Teams

McCarthy-40/4.0/M/Pelican

2026 Man · Cov Adult 40 & Over - Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-23vs Farmer-4.0/40/M/CrossgatesWon 10
W#1 DoublesRobert Humphreys / Eddie Burdette vs Richard Farmer / Pat Neely6-4, 6-4
2026-03-12vs Farmer-4.0/40/M/CrossgatesWon 10
W#1 DoublesRobert Economides / Michael Schwartz vs Richard Farmer / Henry P Calamari6-4, 6-4
2026-02-04vs Farmer-4.0/40/M/CrossgatesWon 10
W#2 DoublesRobert Humphreys / Joey Dunbar vs Henry P Calamari / Carlo Zuniga6-4, 6-4
2026-01-29vs Farmer-4.0/40/M/CrossgatesWon 10
W#2 DoublesRobert Economides / Mark Schneider vs Chris Emerson / Carlo Zuniga6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Cov Adult 40 & Over - Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1McCarthy-40/4.0/M/Pelican4115510157
2Farmer-4.0/40/M/Crossgates1451530200

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Shane McCarthy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
3.96
Edward Dauterive
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.87
Joey Dunbar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.86
Eddie Burdette
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.80
Maxwell Agnew
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.78
Robert Economides
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.71
Keith West
usually #1 Doubles 31%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published
3.69
Jay Butcher
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
3.63
Michael Lane
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.55
Robert Humphreys
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.44
John Hearn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Mark Schneider
published
Michael Schwartz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Keith West + Michael Lane4166% gamesnot enough data
John Hearn + Michael Lane314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shane McCarthy
18W–3L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
4.11
4
Edward Dauterive
16W–0L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.96
Joey Dunbar
8W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Eddie Burdette
12W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
3.86
Maxwell Agnew
18W–2L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
Robert Economides
9W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.78
Keith West
24W–9L career · 13 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.71
Jay Butcher
12W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
8%92%1%
3.69
Michael Lane
35W–8L career · 24 lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
3.63
Robert Humphreys
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.55
John Hearn
12W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
3.44
Mark Schneider
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Schwartz
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.