Teams

PD/55Weaver/FTC

2024 STA Adult Combo 55 & Over - PD · Adult Women - 7.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult Women - 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Druanne Freeman
published
3.59
Kim Osborne
published
3.37
Katie Hensley
published
Ann Carey
published 3.5
3.06
Betsy Graham
published 3.5
3.02
Tracie Cassidy
published
2.97
Merryn Weaver
published
2.95
Jo Ann Nance
published
2.92
Ronelle van Heerden
published
Shannon Grant
published
Sharon Burner
published
Stephanie Light
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jo Ann Nance + Druanne Freeman3346% games−2.9% vs expected
Merryn Weaver + Ann Carey134 matchesnot enough data
Merryn Weaver + Stephanie Light213 matchesnot enough data
Merryn Weaver + Tracie Cassidy123 matchesnot enough data
Katie Hensley + Sharon Burner303 matchesnot enough data
Jo Ann Nance + Kim Osborne303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Druanne Freeman
12W–12L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.63
Kim Osborne
37W–15L career · no lines in 2024
26%73%<1%
3.59
Katie Hensley
43W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.37
3.5
Ann Carey
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Betsy Graham
12W–13L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.06
Tracie Cassidy
11W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.02
Merryn Weaver
19W–30L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
2.97
Jo Ann Nance
18W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
2.95
Ronelle van Heerden
30W–25L career · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
2.92
Shannon Grant
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sharon Burner
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephanie Light
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.