Teams

6 MRTC Northnuts - Ley

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-11-06vs 10 Woodlake Racquettes - PrestonWon 20
W#1 SinglesErin Sheridan vs Blanka White6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesSamantha Wetzel vs Kristine Schneider6-3, 6-1
2025-10-28vs 14 Westwood HarperLost 12
L#1 SinglesXuemin Ginsberg vs Jordan Harper6-7, 6-7
L#2 SinglesLouise McCool vs Meredith Schwartz2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 SinglesKate Waller vs Heather DeBolt6-1, 6-1
2025-10-11vs 4 Southampton Roper 3.5Won 21
L#1 SinglesLouise McCool vs Lily VanElderen6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesSuzanne Ley vs Kristen Roper6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesJennifer Carlin vs April Titler6-4, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Kate Waller
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.42
Louise McCool
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.42
Erin Sheridan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Jessica Parrent
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.21
Xuemin Ginsberg
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.20
Jennifer Carlin
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.15
Suzanne Ley
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.92
Samantha Wetzel
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Shelley Deitz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Louise McCool + Erin Sheridan404 matchesnot enough data
Louise McCool + Kate Waller213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kate Waller
12W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Louise McCool
32W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Erin Sheridan
32W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
Jessica Parrent
27W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
3.37
Xuemin Ginsberg
17W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
Jennifer Carlin
13W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.20
Suzanne Ley
24W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.15
Samantha Wetzel
19W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Shelley Deitz
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.