Teams

DP - Graham

2025 · 2026 SATA USTA Adult 65 & Over (Men) - Fall

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-01-24Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMax Schreiber / Marc Lienard vs Rusty Toler / Michael Chapman4-6, 3-1
L#3 DoublesBarry Hill / Raymond Roberts vs Peter Pasciucco / Gale Slocum3-6, 2-6
2026-01-04vs SATA/Richard GriffinSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMarc Lienard / Max Schreiber vs Andrew Jacobson / Rick Culbreth6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDavid Humphries / Walter Sanderlin vs Peter Pasciucco / Michael Chapman5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-12-29vs DP - GombertWon 10
W#3 DoublesWalter Sanderlin / Barry Hill vs Ralph Gombert / Herbert Moore6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-12-13vs SATA/Richard GriffinLost 01
L#3 DoublesRaymond Roberts / David Humphries vs Harvey Lynn / Brian Zevnik1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2026 SATA USTA Adult 65 & Over (Men) - Fall
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SATA/Richard Griffin5113517153
2DP - Graham3381025185
3DP - Gombert1561226182

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
John Labarbera
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 30% · published
3.27
David Humphries
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.26
Jeffrey Graham
usually #1 Doubles 59%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.11
Barry Hill
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
Marc Lienard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Max Schreiber
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published
Raymond Roberts
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Walter Sanderlin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Labarbera + Jeffrey Graham15358% games+7.5% vs expected
Max Schreiber + David Humphries2345% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Labarbera
44W–19L career · 20 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.66
3.5
David Humphries
5W–5L career · 9 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Jeffrey Graham
20W–12L career · 17 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Barry Hill
9W–27L career · 15 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Marc Lienard
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Max Schreiber
7W–7L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Raymond Roberts
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Walter Sanderlin
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.