Teams

Overserved

2025 55 & Over Fall Women - NA · 7.0 Tuesday Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-12-02vs The New 40Won 20
W#1 DoublesEllen Laubhan / Erica Jones vs Brenda Worsham / Tamara Naquin6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKim Koenig / Christy Rowley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-11-18vs JNCC NewksLost 01
L#2 DoublesRenata Goebel / Christy Rowley vs Alice Phillips / Kristi Schaeper4-6, 3-6
2025-11-11vs Blossom SpinnersWon 20
W#1 DoublesKim Koenig / Ellen Laubhan vs Katherine Larsen / Leanna Davis7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRenata Goebel / Christy Rowley vs Maria Guerra / Maggie Lakata7-6, 7-6
2025-11-04vs Double VisionLost 02
L#1 DoublesNancy Aubin / Susan Cox vs Ginny Bullard / Joy Girouard2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Mushrush / Erica Jones vs Debbie Lowry / Leigh Freeman0-1
2025-09-30vs Love BugsLost 01
L#2 DoublesKim Koenig / Ellen Laubhan vs Maggie Everett / Lynn Platteborze6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Tuesday Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Rhonda Knights
published
3.59
Ellen Laubhan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.38
Renata Goebel
published
3.38
Nancy Aubin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Holly Park
published
3.25
Joan Sixkiller
published
3.23
Lisa Farris
published
3.18
Christy Rowley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.96
Kim Koenig
published
2.91
Kelly Outlaw
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Erica Jones
published
Ivette Buentello
published
Michelle Mushrush
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Aubin + Renata Goebel6455% games+0.2% vs expected
Kim Koenig + Lisa Farris224 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Outlaw + Ellen Laubhan213 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Aubin + Joan Sixkiller213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rhonda Knights
10W–24L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Ellen Laubhan
124W–91L career · 3 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.59
Renata Goebel
25W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
3.38
Nancy Aubin
23W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Holly Park
15W–12L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%12%
3.33
Joan Sixkiller
12W–13L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.25
Lisa Farris
9W–7L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Christy Rowley
39W–45L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Kim Koenig
6W–11L career · no lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
2.96
Kelly Outlaw
27W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
Erica Jones
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Ivette Buentello
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michelle Mushrush
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.