Teams

Brown/Nashville

2025 Adult 40 & Over - Nashville · 4.0 Women - Monday AM

16 players · average NTRP 4.25 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-28vs Hirst/Martin/NashvilleLost 23
W#1 DoublesCassianne Robinson-Cohen / Lauren Wilson vs Scotty Falk / Cindy Knapp6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Evans Weiss vs Jessica Boyd1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHope Cummiskey / Lisa Blalock vs Betsy Delves / Barbee Morgan2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesStacey Andrews / Shelly Laub vs Lynne Anderson / Katherine Goodson0-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#4 DoublesTamara Graham / Julie Hatcher vs Beth Martin / Susan Henry3-6, 1-6
2025-04-21vs Powers/NashvilleWon 40
W#1 DoublesShelly Laub / Stacey Andrews vs Stephanie Webb / Melinda Stone6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHope Cummiskey / Robin Gilliam vs Heather Large / Allyson Edwards6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCarla Rosenthal / Julie Hatcher vs Mindy Higgins / Sarah MacIntyre6-2, 6-2
W#4 DoublesSuzy Simpson / Lauren Wilson vs Ashley Snipes / Beth Gottlieb6-1, 6-1
2025-03-24vs Powers/NashvilleWon 41
W#1 DoublesShelly Laub / Stacey Andrews vs Maggie Kuyper / Stephanie Webb6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesCassianne Robinson-Cohen vs Colleen Andrews6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Thomas / Suzy Simpson vs Allyson Edwards / Erica Collins6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMelinda Brown / Lauren Wilson vs Mindy Higgins / Marie Lakeman6-2, 6-3
W#4 DoublesTamara Graham / Carla Rosenthal vs Julie Dearman / Holly Baumgartner6-2, 6-2
2025-03-17vs Hirst/Martin/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesStacey Andrews / Shelly Laub vs Gretchen Dahle / Katherine Goodson3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCassianne Robinson-Cohen vs Monica Nelson6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLisa Blalock / Robin Gilliam vs Betsy Delves / Heather Skipper1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesHope Cummiskey / Melissa Chadwick vs Barbee Morgan / Scotty Falk2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#4 DoublesJennifer Tackett / Michelle Hoffman vs Hailey Hirst / Lynne Anderson1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women - Monday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Cassianne Robinson-Cohen
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.86
Stacey Andrews
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.86
Melinda Brown
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Shelly Laub
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.75
Michelle Hoffman
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Hope Cummiskey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.70
Robin Gilliam
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Tamara Graham
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Melissa Chadwick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Carla Rosenthal
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Jennifer Tackett
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Julie Hatcher
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
3.43
Elizabeth Evans Weiss
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.40
Lisa Blalock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Suzy Simpson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Maggie McAfee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shelly Laub + Stacey Andrews15563% games+5.2% vs expected
Carla Rosenthal + Tamara Graham224 matchesnot enough data
Hope Cummiskey + Melissa Chadwick213 matchesnot enough data
Hope Cummiskey + Lisa Blalock033 matchesnot enough data
Robin Gilliam + Carla Rosenthal303 matchesnot enough data
Robin Gilliam + Melinda Brown213 matchesnot enough data
Carla Rosenthal + Stacey Andrews303 matchesnot enough data
Stacey Andrews + Melissa Chadwick303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cassianne Robinson-Cohen
17W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
4.11
Stacey Andrews
38W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.86
Melinda Brown
11W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%16%
3.86
Shelly Laub
35W–11L career · 8 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Michelle Hoffman
14W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Hope Cummiskey
14W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Robin Gilliam
21W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Tamara Graham
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Melissa Chadwick
17W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
4
Carla Rosenthal
13W–7L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.60
Jennifer Tackett
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.56
Julie Hatcher
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.56
Elizabeth Evans Weiss
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Lisa Blalock
5W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
3.40
Suzy Simpson
29W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Maggie McAfee
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.