Teams

MILLBRAE RC 40AM3.5A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Men's 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#2 DoublesBenjamin Cha / Michael Wu vs Craig Quan / Byron Lee6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-03-01vs BAY CLUB REDWOOD SHORES 40AM3.5AWon 10
W#2 DoublesSherman Lee / Benjamin Cha vs Anthony Luscri / Evan Elder6-2, 6-2
2025-02-23vs SAN CARLOS TC/ARGUELLO PK 40AM3.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesPaul Longhenry / Benjamin Cha vs Troy Collard / Adam Bloom6-7, 4-3
2025-02-22vs PLEASANTON 40AM3.5BLost 01
L#3 DoublesBenjamin Cha / Somboon Ekgasit vs Abhisek Sinha / Srinivas Javvadi2-6, 6-7
2025-02-15vs PENINSULA TC 40AM3.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesBenjamin Cha / Paul Longhenry vs Christopher Geheran / Chad Partridge6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-02-11vs CROW CANYON CC 40AM3.5AWon 10
W#3 DoublesBenjamin Cha / Vipin Gupta vs Pete Brown / Peter Houston6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Cha / Michael Wu vs Raymond Choye / Shane Reid6-3, 6-3
2025-01-09vs PLEASANTON 40AM3.5DWon 10
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Cha / Somboon Ekgasit vs Apratim Sharma / Dinesh Singh6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Benjamin Cha
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Sean Avent
published
3.25
Paul Longhenry
published
3.25
Corey Liu
published 3.5
3.24
Gordon Hattori
published
3.09
Derrick Wong
published 3.5
3.09
Henry Mok
published
3.05
Paul Noce
published
2.98
Sherman Lee
published
2.90
Eugene Sivadas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gordon Hattori + Paul Noce033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Benjamin Cha
64W–60L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
Sean Avent
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Paul Longhenry
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Corey Liu
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
Gordon Hattori
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Derrick Wong
3W–13L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Henry Mok
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Paul Noce
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
Sherman Lee
5W–14L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.98
Eugene Sivadas
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.