Teams

KY/LEX/Ernst-Simonsen

2025 USTA LEAGUE 40 & Over ADULT LEXINGTON · Women 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.33 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Catherine McDoniel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
Lisa Deaton
published
3.35
Maria del Mar Landron
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Katina Swansegar
published
3.24
Meghan Simonsen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
3.16
Olive Gallagher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Yvonne Conner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Lisa Price
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.12
Aya Tsuchiya
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
3.12
Angie Cobb
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Marvetta Overstreet
published
2.93
Regina Covington
published
2.91
Ria Voth
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Monica Mestanza
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Krista Mullins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria del Mar Landron + Meghan Simonsen1742% games−5.9% vs expected
Regina Covington + Monica Mestanza134 matchesnot enough data
Marvetta Overstreet + Catherine McDoniel314 matchesnot enough data
Angie Cobb + Lisa Deaton224 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Deaton + Meghan Simonsen134 matchesnot enough data
Olive Gallagher + Aya Tsuchiya314 matchesnot enough data
Meghan Simonsen + Yvonne Conner033 matchesnot enough data
Yvonne Conner + Olive Gallagher033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Catherine McDoniel
16W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.55
Lisa Deaton
7W–25L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.40
Maria del Mar Landron
10W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Katina Swansegar
19W–23L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Meghan Simonsen
12W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Olive Gallagher
13W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Yvonne Conner
15W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
Lisa Price
17W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
3
Aya Tsuchiya
44W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.12
3.5
Angie Cobb
4W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
20%79%<1%
3.12
Marvetta Overstreet
11W–51L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.98
Regina Covington
16W–38L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
Ria Voth
6W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.91
Monica Mestanza
5W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.78
Krista Mullins
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.