Teams

FMasucci (WSRC)

2024 Singles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Singles 4.0 Men - Wed PM

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-07vs JMarks (Providence CC)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesPaul Sperry vs Bernardo Llerenas3-6
L#2 SinglesTom Castain vs Christopher Webb1-6, 3-6
2024-07-17vs RGum (Life Time)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesTom Castain vs Thomas Holz4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 SinglesPremkumar Jagannathan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 SinglesFrank Masucci vs Francisco Rivera5-7, 3-6
2024-07-10vs ILevelev (Life Time)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesPaul Sperry vs Bob Hofmann2-6, 1-4
L#2 SinglesTom Castain vs Gustavo Teixeira2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesPremkumar Jagannathan vs Iggy Levelev6-3, 6-2
2024-07-03vs NSharma (Life Time)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesPaul Sperry vs Shaun Sikes4-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesPremkumar Jagannathan vs Raj Voleti4-6, 0-6
2024-06-19vs MBoyce (Queens)Split 11
W#1 SinglesPaul Sperry vs David Huff6-4, 6-1
L#3 SinglesPremkumar Jagannathan vs Andrew Nesbitt2-6, 2-6
2024-06-12Lost 02
L#1 SinglesPaul Sperry vs Jacob Huffaker4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesTom Castain vs Amit Chandra1-6, 0-6
2024-06-05vs KSathyamoorthy (Life Time)Won 20
W#1 SinglesPaul Sperry vs Kumar Merchant6-4, 6-0
W#3 SinglesTom Castain vs Vidya Kondabathini7-6, 2-4
2024-05-29vs MSoloway (OPRC)Split 11
W#1 SinglesPaul Sperry vs Marc Soloway6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesTom Castain vs Matthew Niess6-2, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 4.0 Men - Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Clayton Kent
published 4
3.74
Frank Masucci
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.68
Paul Sperry
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.58
Premkumar Jagannathan
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.55
3.49
Tom Castain
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.30
Eric O'Bryan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Premkumar Jagannathan + Tom Castain1844% games+4.7% vs expected
Paul Sperry + Frank Masucci4744% gamesnot enough data
Premkumar Jagannathan + Frank Masucci1436% gamesnot enough data
Frank Masucci + Tom Castain2348% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Clayton Kent
1W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Frank Masucci
113W–111L career · 1 line in 2024
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Paul Sperry
57W–64L career · 7 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Premkumar Jagannathan
56W–86L career · 4 lines in 2024
28%71%<1%
3.58
4
Patrick Murchison
55W–48L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Tom Castain
82W–140L career · type A · 6 lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
3.49
Eric O'Bryan
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%2%98%
3.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.