Teams

BC-WestEnd/BrentBlackman

2022 ADULT 18 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Men - 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.69 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-02Won 10
W#1 DoublesEdward Schuh / Howard Kim vs David Stone / Don Boss6-4, 6-4
2022-06-25vs BC-AltaVista/PeterDeVriesLost 01
L#2 DoublesEdward Schuh / Darren Church vs Kako Mendez / Tyler Barnhardt5-7, 2-6
2022-06-18vs BC-MCC/JanetWisialowskiWon 10
W#2 DoublesKarl Ziegler / Edward Schuh vs Tom Finn / Dennis Twombley7-5, 6-2
2022-06-12vs BC-Kramer/ChristopherBallWon 10
W#2 SinglesEdward Schuh vs Kevin Amaya6-1, 6-0
2022-06-04vs BC-MiraCosta/MarkWarshawWon 10
W#2 DoublesEdward Schuh / Howard Kim vs NIYANT MEHTA / Ramakant Shenoy6-1, 7-5
2022-05-14vs BC-PVTC/BrianO'SullivanWon 10
W#1 DoublesHoward Kim / Edward Schuh vs David Stumfall / Brian Haag6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Men - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Edward Schuh
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.70
Jose Ocampo
published 4
3.59
Brent Blackman
published 4
3.56
Venk Tatineni
published
3.52
Keith French
published
3.40
Brad Jacobson
published 3.5
3.38
Brent Abrenica
published 3.5
3.35
Yeerik Moy
published
3.31
Karl Ziegler
published
3.31
Mohammad Holil
published
Andre Latuf
published 3.5
Gregory Olson
published 3.5
3.22
Edgar Paz
published 3.5
Jon Heyman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jose Ocampo + Edward Schuh5457% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Edward Schuh
124W–80L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Jose Ocampo
52W–43L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Brent Blackman
2W–10L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Venk Tatineni
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.56
Keith French
21W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%42%58%
3.52
3.5
Brad Jacobson
16W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Brent Abrenica
18W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
Yeerik Moy
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
Karl Ziegler
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Mohammad Holil
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Andre Latuf
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Gregory Olson
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Edgar Paz
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
Jon Heyman
1W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.