Teams

Jieming-3.0-social

2025 NWW Winter Singles Flex (Social) · 3.0 Men

1 player · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings20 teams · 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Pham5050020
2Houman-3.03030119
3C Castaneda202009
4Madison Flex (can play during daytime)2020010
5Ethan Wong202018
6SFL-WWang-20252121217
7Social King2121217
8Beck (social)2121321
9Pokorny2323639
10savasp-3.0-social1111217
11McCoy1212431
12Baghai000000
13Dougherty000000
14Long000000
15Jieming-3.0-social0101212
16Clark0202424
17Huang0202424
18Wu0202424
19CD0202424
20SMcCarron0202424

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.50
Jieming Di
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jieming Di
13W–22L career · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.