Teams

Pinellas - Bardmoor/Gross

2022 Pinellas Adult 40 & Over Spring Weekend · 3.5 W Saturday

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-06-11vs Tarpon BourgeoisWon 30
W#1 DoublesJackie Detrick / Kimberly Northup vs Kelly Goldberg / Joan Johnson6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesTamara Tindell vs Tracy Bickel6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnne Remie / Harriet Cregann vs Judy Carlin / Sherrie Bourgeois7-6, 7-6
2022-06-08vs Belleair LeaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJackie Detrick / Kimberly Northup vs Ann Lea / Lori Emery6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesTamara Tindell vs Stacey Reznicek3-6, 5-7
2022-05-21vs ELW FriesWon 20
W#1 DoublesJackie Detrick / Kimberly Northup vs Noela Fries / Paula Uselis6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAnne Remie / Harriet Cregann vs Lou Reavis / Debra Burwell7-5, 7-5
2022-05-14vs Seminole Lake KelseySplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnne Remie / Kimberly Northup vs Rachel Karioki / Sherrl Fry4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTamara Tindell vs Jessica Tas7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2022-05-07Won 20
W#1 DoublesKimberly Northup / Jackie Detrick vs Deborah Larsen / Karen Miller6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTamara Tindell vs Kim Williams6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2022-04-30vs ELW FriesWon 20
W#1 SinglesTamara Tindell vs Bea Lynch6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAnne Remie / Sally Blush vs Ana Jara / Joanne Dickson6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-23vs Belleair LeaWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnne Remie / Harriet Cregann vs Stacy Perry / Dawn Ameel6-2, 7-6
W#1 SinglesTamara Tindell vs Yve Feinberg2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJackie Detrick / Kimberly Northup vs Ann Lea / Lori Emery6-1, 6-1
2022-04-16vs Tarpon BourgeoisWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnne Remie / Harriet Cregann vs Kelly Goldberg / Barbara Nicoll3-3
2022-04-09vs Seminole Lake CokeWon 20
W#1 DoublesKimberly Northup / Gina Morgan vs Chary Acevedo / Nathalie Kobel6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesTamara Tindell vs Kim Williams7-5, 6-2
2022-04-02vs Seminole Lake KelseyWon 30
W#1 DoublesHarriet Cregann / Anne Remie vs Sherrl Fry / January Moennig6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesTamara Tindell vs Jessica Tas7-5, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDanielle Haggar / Kimberly Northup vs Terry Kelsey / Kristen Pierce6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Chieko Perry
published 4
3.56
Harriet Cregann
published 4
3.46
Kimberly Northup
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.45
Tamara Tindell
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Anne Remie
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Arlene Fricke
published 3.5
Cindy Ferguson
published 3.5
3.25
Maribel Gross
published
3.23
Danielle Haggar
published 3.5
3.22
Christine Campbell
published 3.5
3.13
Sally Blush
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle Haggar + Tamara Tindell4160% games−2.0% vs expected
Kimberly Northup + Tamara Tindell134 matchesnot enough data
Maribel Gross + Anne Remie123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chieko Perry
80W–103L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Harriet Cregann
9W–17L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.56
4
Kimberly Northup
66W–50L career · 8 lines in 2022
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
Tamara Tindell
97W–50L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Anne Remie
136W–73L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Arlene Fricke
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Cindy Ferguson
15W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Maribel Gross
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Danielle Haggar
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Christine Campbell
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
Sally Blush
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.