Teams

LA - Slice Girls

2021 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Women 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-12-11vs LA - LATCLost 02
L#1 DoublesEmma Gardner / KATHRYN DURHAM vs Kate Angelo / Mylene Moreno6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesYanti Molsing / Rina Matsuoka vs Kelly Hatosy / Karen Chou4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRina Matsuoka / Andrea Shintani vs Michelle Fowler / Ruth McNulty5-7, 4-5
2021-11-06vs LA - Victorious SecretLost 01
L#3 DoublesAndrea Shintani / Cynthia Wood vs Ana Calleja / Alexis Cittadine3-6, 2-6
2021-10-31vs LA - Shadow's AcesLost 01
L#3 DoublesRina Matsuoka / Laura Branigan vs Michelle Crossman / Tori Thompson2-6, 2-6
2021-10-24vs LA - Queen AnneLost 01
L#2 DoublesDelta Wright / Rina Matsuoka vs Tamara Treu / AJ Pruett2-6, 4-6
2021-10-17vs LA - Kiss My AceLost 01
L#3 DoublesLaura Branigan / Andrea Shintani vs Becky Leibowitz / Andrea Kinloch1-6, 1-6
2021-09-26vs LA - LATCWon 20
W#1 DoublesEmma Gardner / Indira Laksmana vs Mylene Moreno / MARY WOODWARD6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLaura Branigan / Rina Matsuoka vs Milinda McNeely / Nora Suk7-5, 6-3
W#1 DoublesYanti Molsing / Emma Gardner vs Michelle Fowler / Karen Vidal6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2021-09-12vs LA - Downtown AcesLost 02
L#2 DoublesRina Matsuoka / Tanya Zarnitsa vs Mai Kajikawa / Mindy Schiffman3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAndrea Shintani / Delta Wright vs Johanna Baumann / Meredith Levine3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Emma Gardner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.31
Rina Matsuoka
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Julie Vlasak
published
2.94
Laura Branigan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
Grace Day
published 3
2.81
Andrea Shintani
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Delta Wright
published 3
Kathy Benjamin
published
Tanya Zarnitsa
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Shintani + Laura Branigan5354% gamesnot enough data
Rina Matsuoka + Laura Branigan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emma Gardner
23W–26L career · 3 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.70
3.5
Rina Matsuoka
44W–47L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
Julie Vlasak
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.04
3
Laura Branigan
27W–48L career · type A · 3 lines in 2021
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Grace Day
6W–12L career · no lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Andrea Shintani
50W–69L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
2.81
3
Delta Wright
8W–10L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
2.67
Kathy Benjamin
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tanya Zarnitsa
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.