Teams

BH - Haines

Mixed Doubles 55 & Over - Invitational · 3.5 - 6 Team Draw (CLOSED)

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings7 teams · 3.5 - 6 Team Draw (CLOSED)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GS - Policelli000000
2BH - Palco000000
3BH - Anderson000000
4HU - Calvert000000
5BH - Haines000000
6TU - Duren000000
7Mgm - Hayes000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Shannon Berg
published
3.39
Valerie Holmes
published
3.35
Roberta Leach
published
3.33
Ronnie McFarling
published
3.31
Donna Maneice
published 3.5
3.25
Wendell Gibson
published
3.25
Kristi Dutton
published
3.25
Diana Daniel
published 3.5
3.24
Chris Fields
published 3.5
3.15
Eddie Crim
published 3.5
3.14
Edward Bradford
published 3.5
3.09
Jane Haines
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendell Gibson + Diana Daniel8160% games+3.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shannon Berg
68W–59L career · no lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.56
Valerie Holmes
74W–50L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.39
Roberta Leach
43W–29L career · no lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.35
Ronnie McFarling
36W–35L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Donna Maneice
21W–22L career · no lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
Wendell Gibson
26W–24L career · no lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.25
Kristi Dutton
36W–43L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Diana Daniel
73W–36L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.25
3.5
Chris Fields
24W–41L career · no lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Eddie Crim
17W–20L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Edward Bradford
18W–17L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%<1%
3.14
Jane Haines
29W–29L career · no lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.