Teams

A18 3.0M MM2 Samantaray

2025 NEOTA Adult 18 & Over Summer · NEOTA A18&O 3.0 Men Summer

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-30vs A18 3.0M WE RizzaWon 41
L#1 DoublesJohn Winzig / Seetharaman Kalyanasundaram vs Michael Henry / Michael Deyo4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLuke Karavolis vs Jim Hester6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPuranjay Samantaray / Sumit Patil vs Jack Zilly / Dino Rizza6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMuneeb Ilyas vs Andrew Burnight6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDevesh Pandey / Ramana Bhavaraju vs Mark Chiacchiari / Ryan Woodruff6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-06-23vs A18 3.0M CV FryLost 23
L#1 DoublesNarender Singh / Padmanabha Kulkarni vs Brandon Johannes / Carl Parker3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLuke Karavolis vs Andy Kreger6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSumit Patil / Ashutosh Chaudhary vs Tim Hofer / Nick Slezak0-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesJohn Winzig vs Nagaraju Sarabu6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPuranjay Samantaray / Seetharaman Kalyanasundaram vs Mike Carroll / Lance Fry6-3, 6-4
2025-05-19vs A18 3.0M WE RizzaWon 41
W#1 DoublesMuneeb Ilyas / Ramana Bhavaraju vs David Shisila / Michael Deyo6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesLuke Karavolis vs Jim Hester6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDevesh Pandey / Paritosh Juyal vs Mark Chiacchiari / Michael Henry4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesJohn Winzig vs Thomas Shaw4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSumit Patil / Manthan Shah vs Kiyotaka Fukamachi / Dino Rizza6-2, 6-1
2025-05-12vs A18 3.0M CV FryWon 32
W#1 DoublesJohn Winzig / Luke Karavolis vs Carl Parker / Jonathan Slain6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesArul Mathew vs Nick Slezak7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNarender Singh / Padmanabha Kulkarni vs Mike Carroll / Christian Manchester6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesPuranjay Samantaray vs Charles Johnson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAshutosh Chaudhary / Seetharaman Kalyanasundaram vs Andy Kreger / Lance Fry4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NEOTA A18&O 3.0 Men Summer have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Luke Karavolis
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.99
Jeetendra Jha
published
2.95
John Winzig
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.95
Narender Singh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.94
Muneeb Ilyas
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.86
Seetharaman Kalyanasundaram
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
Paritosh Juyal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Sumit Patil
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Ashutosh Chaudhary
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.79
Manthan Shah
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Arul Mathew
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.69
Devesh Pandey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.63
Puranjay Samantaray
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.61
Padmanabha Kulkarni
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Mayank Kapoor
published
Ramana Bhavaraju
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paritosh Juyal + Ashutosh Chaudhary10254% games+0.1% vs expected
Narender Singh + Puranjay Samantaray2349% gamesnot enough data
Ashutosh Chaudhary + Jeetendra Jha3251% gamesnot enough data
Puranjay Samantaray + Padmanabha Kulkarni224 matchesnot enough data
Sumit Patil + Ashutosh Chaudhary224 matchesnot enough data
Sumit Patil + Jeetendra Jha404 matchesnot enough data
Manthan Shah + Narender Singh033 matchesnot enough data
Manthan Shah + Paritosh Juyal213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Luke Karavolis
36W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.42
Jeetendra Jha
24W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
John Winzig
19W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Narender Singh
27W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
Muneeb Ilyas
7W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.94
Seetharaman Kalyanasundaram
11W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.86
Paritosh Juyal
35W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
Sumit Patil
22W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Ashutosh Chaudhary
20W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Manthan Shah
14W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Arul Mathew
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Devesh Pandey
8W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
2.69
Puranjay Samantaray
18W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
Padmanabha Kulkarni
13W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
Mayank Kapoor
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ramana Bhavaraju
11W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.