Teams

LTCLong/Peninsula Tri B Wed am

2023 Lake USTA Tri Level Level 18 & Over · Women's Group B 3.0, 3.5 & 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.56 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-08-09vs LTMSmith/LNTC Tri BLost 03
L#1 DoublesMindy Francis / Suzun McCrary vs Melissa Smith / Leah Russell4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Carlyle / Elizabeth Johnson vs Lori Anne Emlong / Jana Watt4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSusan King / Jennifer Saxton vs Dawn Andiloro / Lisa Turley7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2023-08-02vs LTLSchacher/Trump Tri BLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Ross / Kim Kelly Senff vs Caroline Ray / Michelle Noglows6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChristine Tattersfield / Maureen Leach vs Katrina Childers / Amy Gandy5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBonnie Zentner / Nicole Monacell vs Sarah Hoglund / Aleah Wolfe2-6, 1-6
2023-08-01vs KGoodnough/Westport Tri BWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Carlyle / Elizabeth Johnson vs Patricia Ferguson / Katelyn Goodnough6-4, 6-1
2023-07-26vs LCBogojevich/CSD Tri BWon 30
W#1 DoublesSuzun McCrary / Jennifer Ross vs Jennifer Joiner / Jodi Patterson6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCindy Long / Kim Kelly Senff vs Kathy Buaron / Victoria Peaire6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBonnie Zentner / Jennifer Saxton vs Olesia Kososki / Kristen Rogers6-0, 6-0
2023-06-28vs LTSClancy/CRP Tri BLost 12
L#1 DoublesKim Kelly Senff / Danielle Mikolajczyk vs Annie Edenfield / Stephanie Clancy1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Ross / Lisa Carlyle vs Karen Allison / Jane Heredia7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNicole Monacell / Bonnie Zentner vs Bethany Barber / Katherine Karnatz6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2023-06-27vs LTLWallace/Edgemoor Tri B Wed amLost 12
L#1 DoublesDanielle Mikolajczyk / Cindy Long vs Millie Taylor / Kari Comadoll6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSusan King / Christine Tattersfield vs Shakira Basinger / Lane Wallace2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Saxton / Courtney Stachowski vs Carol Latimer / Carrie Bardinas4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-06-14vs LTCPoell/Holbrook Tri B Wed AMSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDanielle Mikolajczyk / Elizabeth Johnson vs Cyndi Poell / Karen Haigney2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Saxton / Nicole Monacell vs Kay James / Karen Cooper6-2, 6-0
2023-06-07vs LTJYAUDES/Jetton Tri BWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Ross / Suzun McCrary vs Bibi Muraira / Traci Dudan6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKim Kelly Senff / Maureen Leach vs Amy Light / Jenny Yaudes6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNicole Monacell / Bonnie Zentner vs Jamie Cooper / Colleen Yura6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's Group B 3.0, 3.5 & 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Danielle Mikolajczyk
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.50
Kim Kelly Senff
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.50
Bonnie Zentner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.50
Nicole Monacell
published
3.38
Christine Tattersfield
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.36
Lisa Carlyle
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.30
Jennifer Saxton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Courtney Stachowski
published 3.5
3.11
Suzun McCrary
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Mindy Francis
published
Maureen Leach
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Kelly Senff + Danielle Mikolajczyk8655% games+3.0% vs expected
Danielle Mikolajczyk + Bonnie Zentner8753% games−0.8% vs expected
Danielle Mikolajczyk + Lisa Carlyle5450% games−6.8% vs expected
Kim Kelly Senff + Bonnie Zentner224 matchesnot enough data
Danielle Mikolajczyk + Nicole Monacell224 matchesnot enough data
Bonnie Zentner + Lisa Carlyle404 matchesnot enough data
Bonnie Zentner + Nicole Monacell044 matchesnot enough data
Christine Tattersfield + Danielle Mikolajczyk033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Danielle Mikolajczyk
141W–103L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Kim Kelly Senff
144W–103L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
3.50
4
Bonnie Zentner
132W–72L career · 6 lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.50
Nicole Monacell
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.50
3.5
Christine Tattersfield
117W–55L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Lisa Carlyle
120W–65L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Jennifer Saxton
89W–33L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Courtney Stachowski
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Suzun McCrary
83W–87L career · 3 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.11
Mindy Francis
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.08
Maureen Leach
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.