Teams

Simpson/Nashville

2026 Adult 40 & Over - Nashville · 3.5 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-04-17vs Sather/NashvilleWon 40
W#1 DoublesJulie Burnstein / Sandra Rudd vs Aimee Lawson / Jessica Davis6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesGinger Childs vs Natalie Goldsby6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMaryam Khan / Nicole Gaia vs Kathy Hirsekorn / Joanie Bowles6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCaroline Bryan / Cristin Roark vs Danielle Calvello / Heather Burkholder6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-04-03vs Kumar/Plumlee/NashvilleWon 40
W#1 DoublesJulie Dearman / Caroline Bryan vs Nina Kumar / Sonja Plumlee6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGinger Childs / Cristin Roark vs Marian Vangeli / Tammy Shrivalle7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNancy Russell / Stephanie Webb vs Perry Baltasar / Sarah Dorr6-4, 6-4
W#4 DoublesJulie Burnstein / Maryam Khan vs Teresa Hamilton / Kathy McCabe6-2, 6-1
2026-03-06vs Thoma/NashvilleWon 50
W#1 DoublesJulie Burnstein / Julie Hatcher vs Kelli Alarcon / Leola Meiners6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJessica Brende vs Emily Pierre6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPoonam Kabaria / Maryam Khan vs Nobu Junge / Nicky Nash6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Dearman / Caroline Bryan vs Renee Stewart / Leigh Ann Portale6-3, 6-2
W#4 DoublesNancy Russell / Sandra Rudd vs CARMEN KING / Colleen Bracken6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Kathleen Malchow
published
3.65
Brittany Anthony
published 3.5
3.58
Jennifer Meeks
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Julie Burnstein
usually #4 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.56
Julie Hatcher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.43
Poonam Kabaria
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.43
Ginger Childs
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Suzy Simpson
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Maryam Khan
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Cristin Roark
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.33
Sandra Rudd
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
Julie Dearman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Jessica Brende
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.20
Nancy Russell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Angela Tarrance
published 3.5
3.15
Caroline Bryan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Nicole Gaia
usually #4 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cristin Roark + Ginger Childs5158% games+6.6% vs expected
Maryam Khan + Poonam Kabaria8261% games+0.7% vs expected
Suzy Simpson + Jennifer Meeks5056% gamesnot enough data
Sandra Rudd + Nancy Russell123 matchesnot enough data
Caroline Bryan + Julie Dearman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathleen Malchow
12W–11L career · no lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.70
3.5
Brittany Anthony
18W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.65
Jennifer Meeks
23W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.58
Julie Burnstein
47W–29L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.57
Julie Hatcher
8W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.56
Poonam Kabaria
34W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Ginger Childs
39W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
Suzy Simpson
40W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
Maryam Khan
21W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Cristin Roark
21W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
3.34
Sandra Rudd
12W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
Julie Dearman
29W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
Jessica Brende
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%5%
3.29
Nancy Russell
13W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Angela Tarrance
4W–11L career · no lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Caroline Bryan
23W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.15
Nicole Gaia
2W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.