Teams

KY/LEX/Yanik

2026 USTA SINGLES 18 & OVER LEXINGTON · 2.5 Women Singles

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-28vs KY/LEX/FosterLost 01
L#2 SinglesJana Hedges vs Chenyi Qiu0-6, 2-6
2026-07-19vs KY/LEX/FosterLost 01
L#1 SinglesJana Hedges vs Qingru Xu0-6, 0-6
2026-07-13vs KY/LEX/FosterLost 03
L#1 SinglesDezirae Shukla vs Qingru Xu2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Yanik vs Chenyi Qiu3-6, 3-4
L#3 SinglesJana Hedges vs Laura Moffett3-6, 2-6
2026-06-28vs KY/LEX/FosterLost 02
L#1 SinglesNiki Moss vs Amanda Fredericks1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesDezirae Shukla vs Chenyi Qiu1-6, 3-6
2026-06-15vs KY/LEX/FosterLost 03
L#1 SinglesNiki Moss vs Laura Moffett7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesDezirae Shukla vs Qingru Xu0-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesJana Hedges vs Amanda Fredericks0-6, 2-6
2026-06-06vs KY/LEX/FosterSplit 11
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Yanik vs Qingru Xu0-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesJana Hedges vs Allyson Foster6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2026-06-04vs KY/LEX/FosterLost 03
L#1 SinglesNiki Moss vs Qingru Xu3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesTara Lopez vs Chenyi Qiu3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesJana Hedges vs Allyson Foster3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2.5 Women Singles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/LEX/Foster7015613122
2KY/LEX/Yanik0712041250

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.20 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.30
Lindsey Burchett
published
2.29
Niki Moss
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.26
Elizabeth Yanik
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.19
Dezirae Shukla
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.11
Tara Lopez
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.07
Jana Hedges
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Yanik + Dezirae Shukla213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsey Burchett
7W–7L career · no lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.30
Niki Moss
14W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.29
Elizabeth Yanik
9W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.26
2.5
Dezirae Shukla
4W–10L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Tara Lopez
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Jana Hedges
2W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.