Teams

Ryan - Overserved

2025 Charlottesville Tri-Level · Charlottesville Tri-Level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-16vs Ruschmann - Tri-FectaWon 20
W#1 DoublesKelley Ryan / Kelly Lindauer vs Amy Taggart / Nancy Ingram6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLauren Dunn / Silvia Blemker vs Patricia Irby / Gretchen Masselli6-1, 7-5
2025-08-19vs Merrick - KeswickWon 10
W#2 DoublesLauren Dunn / Silvia Blemker vs Janet Silvester / Amelia Black6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSilvia Blemker / Diana Whitten vs Celia Aidinoff / Dianna Gibson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-07-29vs DiVita - Tri To Beat UsWon 20
W#1 DoublesKelley Ryan / Kelly Lindauer vs Andrea Seese / Judith Divita6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEsther Cho / Silvia Blemker vs Maren Ward / Lynette Sanford7-5, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Tri-Level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Kelley Ryan
published
3.42
Carrie Cooper
published 3.5
3.40
Kelly Lindauer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Melissa Hoover
published
3.22
Polly Hunter
published
3.10
Kailey Boatright
published
2.99
Esther Cho
published
2.92
Diana Whitten
published 3
2.77
Silvia Blemker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.51
Monica Prichard
published
2.42
Melissa Grossman
published
2.38
Kathryn Harris
published
2.27
Sherry Lake
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrie Cooper + Melissa Hoover4160% games+6.6% vs expected
Kelly Lindauer + Melissa Hoover213 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Hoover + Polly Hunter033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelley Ryan
18W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Carrie Cooper
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Kelly Lindauer
88W–47L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Melissa Hoover
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Polly Hunter
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Kailey Boatright
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.10
Esther Cho
16W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Diana Whitten
20W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Silvia Blemker
82W–66L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
2.77
Monica Prichard
12W–13L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
2.51
Melissa Grossman
12W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%72%28%
2.42
Kathryn Harris
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%79%21%
2.38
Sherry Lake
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.