Teams

SLMShipman/Holbrook

2022 Lake 40 Over Summer Singles · 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-08-05vs SLAGandy/TrumpWon 20
W#1 SinglesMeredith Ortiz vs Keri Norcross6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesJenny Yaudes vs Lisa Schacher4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-07-29vs SLAGandy/TrumpWon 21
L#1 SinglesNaila Campbell vs Lisa Schacher6-7, 6-7
W#2 SinglesKelly Stamey vs Keri Norcross7-5, 6-4
W#3 SinglesAndrea McRorie vs Allison Nelin6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2022-07-22vs SLAGandy/TrumpWon 20
W#2 SinglesJenny Yaudes vs Amy Gandy6-4, 6-4
W#3 SinglesNaila Campbell vs Allison Nelin6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2022-07-13vs SLAGandy/TrumpWon 20
W#1 SinglesAndrea McRorie vs Katrina Childers4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKelly Stamey vs Amy Gandy4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-06-27Won 30
W#1 SinglesMeredith Ortiz vs Amy Gandy6-4, 7-5
W#2 SinglesAndrea McRorie vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesJenny Yaudes vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-13vs SLAGandy/TrumpSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMeredith Ortiz vs Katrina Childers3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 SinglesKelly Stamey vs Dawn Aldrich3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-06-06vs SLAGandy/TrumpWon 20
W#1 SinglesMeredith Ortiz vs Keri Norcross2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 SinglesAndrea McRorie vs Amy Gandy6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Melissa Shipman
published
3.79
Jenny Yaudes
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.69
Traci Dudan
published
3.53
Naila Campbell
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.48
Liz Mcclain
published
3.43
Kelly Stamey
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Meredith Ortiz
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Andrea McRorie
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenny Yaudes + Kelly Stamey10257% games−0.4% vs expected
Andrea McRorie + Jenny Yaudes241652% games−6.9% vs expected
Andrea McRorie + Kelly Stamey314 matchesnot enough data
Naila Campbell + Jenny Yaudes123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa Shipman
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
74%26%<1%
3.92
4
Jenny Yaudes
175W–119L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
Traci Dudan
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.69
3.5
Naila Campbell
90W–72L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.53
Liz Mcclain
70W–42L career · no lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Kelly Stamey
133W–105L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Meredith Ortiz
123W–106L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Andrea McRorie
190W–160L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.