Teams

James

2026 FW Combo Tournament · 8.5 Ladies

10 players · average NTRP 4.29 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-05-24vs FindleyLost 03
L#1 DoublesErin Barnes / Cari Rader vs Tamara Murer / Erica Whiteway3-6, 2-4
L#2 DoublesChelsea James / Erin Robinett vs Aubrey Findley / Cassi Cole3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAndrea Girolamo / Samantha Daggett vs Ashley Reaves / Janis Barbash3-6, 2-6
2026-05-24vs HeWon 21
L#1 DoublesChelsea James / Cari Rader vs Alanna Ely / Enya He1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesChristina Cung / Regan Burdett vs Queenie Syre / Natalie Ricketts2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesErin Robinett / Andrea Girolamo vs Michelle Watson / Ryoko Suzuki6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2026-05-23vs Albus/TebeauxLost 03
L#1 DoublesChelsea James / Regan Burdett vs Areli Martinez / Bridgette Krippel2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChristina Cung / Cari Rader vs Elise Jeffery / Bree Young3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTarin Wallace / Samantha Daggett vs Melissa Greenhill / Kimberly Grogan4-6, 2-6
2026-05-23vs Baden/HoltLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrea Girolamo / Sarah Grimmer vs Kelsey Davis / Natalie Timothy2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTarin Wallace / Erin Robinett vs Caroline Baden / Katherine Smith2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesErin Barnes / Drew Brigati vs Kate VandeBerghe / Edith Kruckmann6-3, 6-3
2026-05-22vs ChildressLost 03
L#1 DoublesChelsea James / Sarah Grimmer vs Ashley Longoria / Heather Steele Curtis6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesErin Barnes / Cari Rader vs Cris Garcia / Andrea Taylor3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristina Cung / Samantha Daggett vs Sandi Shipley / Marcela Serna2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 8.5 Ladies
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Albus/Tebeaux4110511115
2Findley4110511112
3Baden/Holt4110514126
4Childress146921154
5He146921154
6James1431226171

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Erin Barnes
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.06
Tarin Wallace
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.06
Chelsea James
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.97
Christina Cung
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.96
Andrea Girolamo
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.92
Regan Burdett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.65
Cari Rader
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.64
Drew Brigati
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Erin Robinett
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.57
Samantha Daggett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cari Rader + Erin Barnes6257% games+9.0% vs expected
Christina Cung + Drew Brigati404 matchesnot enough data
Erin Robinett + Drew Brigati213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Erin Barnes
23W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
4.08
Tarin Wallace
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
4.06
4.5
Chelsea James
14W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
32%67%<1%
4.06
4.5
Christina Cung
25W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
3.97
4.5
Andrea Girolamo
8W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
3.96
Regan Burdett
20W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Cari Rader
17W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
3.65
4
Drew Brigati
18W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Erin Robinett
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.62
Samantha Daggett
9W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.