Teams

Boone Park - Woods

2022 Duval Adult 40 & Over - Women · 4.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.20 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-04-18vs OakBridge - MillerLost 01
L#1 DoublesJana Dankelman / Grace Walsh vs Cynthia McGehee / Krista Brown0-6, 0-6
2022-03-06vs Ponte Vedra - McCarthyLost 01
L#3 DoublesMichiele Sherman / Grace Walsh vs Donna Bush / Julie Henderson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-02-23vs DUVAL - Marsh Landing - BushLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichiele Sherman / Grace Walsh vs Andrea Griswell / Violet Deen6-7, 2-6
2022-01-30vs OakBridge - MillerLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichiele Sherman / Grace Walsh vs Sue Levin / Rebecca Sejeck4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Carolina Rechy
published 4.5
3.98
Hiroko Frederick
published 4.5
3.98
Faye Woods
published 4
3.94
Julie Ferguson
published
3.93
Michiele Sherman
published
3.90
Virginia Watson
published
3.85
Ruth Jones-Looney
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.67
Grace Walsh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.53
Kristen Lancaster
published
Loretta Zubero
published
Marylou Dankelman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Grace Walsh + Michiele Sherman3351% games−4.9% vs expected
Faye Woods + Virginia Watson314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carolina Rechy
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Hiroko Frederick
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.98
4
Faye Woods
33W–58L career · no lines in 2022
<1%55%44%
3.98
Julie Ferguson
1W–13L career · no lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
3.94
Michiele Sherman
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.93
Virginia Watson
11W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Ruth Jones-Looney
93W–65L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Grace Walsh
71W–65L career · 4 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.67
Kristen Lancaster
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
3.53
Loretta Zubero
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Marylou Dankelman
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.