Teams

PD18/Lee/FTC

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over - PD · 3.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 2.88 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-05vs PD18/Storr/EBEWon 41
W#1 DoublesNing Wharton / Lorraine Tindal vs Kenyon Storr / Ashley Lide6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMadison Rials vs Haixia Xi6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPamela Richardson / Laura Anne Hofler vs Anna Chinnes / Lilly Lai6-2, 7-6
W#2 SinglesStacie Watford vs Ashton Matthews6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTeresa Cheng / Brandi Davis vs Helen Carroll / Haley Wightman3-6, 4-6
2025-03-15vs PD18/Storr/EBEWon 31
W#1 DoublesMisty Lee / Madison Rials vs Kenyon Storr / Anna Chinnes6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesPamela Richardson vs Ashton Matthews3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesNing Wharton / Teresa Cheng vs Alexandra Ridgeway / Lilly Lai6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBeth Dynan / Brandi Davis vs Regie Genete / Kelli McGregor0-1
2025-02-08vs PD18/Storr/EBEWon 41
L#1 DoublesMisty Lee / Brandi Davis vs Kenyon Storr / Anna Chinnes6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesStacie Watford vs Lilly Lai6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLorraine Tindal / Beth Dynan vs Alexandra Ridgeway / Helen Carroll6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLaurin Gandy vs Lisa Wallace6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTeresa Cheng / Ning Wharton vs Haixia Xi / Haley Wightman7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Ning Wharton
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Madison Rials
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.91
Stacie Watford
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.86
Brandi Davis
published 3
2.76
Laurin Gandy
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.63
Teresa Cheng
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.62
Lorraine Tindal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.57
Misty Lee
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.50
Beth Dynan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.47
Laura Anne Hofler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Robin Downing
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.19
Caitlin Kocherla
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
1.97
Celeste Wearing
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Pamela Richardson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lorraine Tindal + Teresa Cheng5061% games+12.2% vs expected
Misty Lee + Madison Rials224 matchesnot enough data
Robin Downing + Misty Lee213 matchesnot enough data
Brandi Davis + Misty Lee213 matchesnot enough data
Brandi Davis + Beth Dynan213 matchesnot enough data
Teresa Cheng + Ning Wharton303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ning Wharton
53W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
Madison Rials
27W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.97
Stacie Watford
18W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
Brandi Davis
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
Laurin Gandy
29W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%3%97%
2.76
Teresa Cheng
28W–24L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%17%83%
2.63
Lorraine Tindal
26W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%20%80%
2.62
Misty Lee
31W–43L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%30%70%
2.57
3
Beth Dynan
14W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
2.50
Laura Anne Hofler
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.47
Robin Downing
19W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%66%34%
2.44
3
Caitlin Kocherla
2W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.19
2.5
Celeste Wearing
2W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.97
Pamela Richardson
5W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.