Teams

Team 6 Lucky Spin

2025 NOVA Combo · NOVA Combo 6.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-25vs Team 12 Haven Aces 6.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesKimberly Pedersen / Julie Powers vs Terry Siegfried / Caroline Kahl6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Jin / Pauline Tsai vs Karina Agudelo / Mary Lewis7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesPin Satjayakorn / Johanne Maher vs Jenifer Heilig / Beth Kiesner1-6, 3-6
2025-10-12vs Team 10 Westwood RacquettesLost 02
L#1 DoublesPin Satjayakorn / Karen Jin vs Valerie Camillo / Jacqueline Diaz3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesVirginia Oconnell / Bernadett Damico vs Erin West / Jacquelyn McVey4-6, 1-6
2025-10-05vs Team 8 Mulanbloom 6.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBernadett Damico / Tapleigh Niethamer vs Yuan Zhang / Xinyu Wei5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Jin / Pauline Tsai vs Caixia Che / Qing Lin2-6, 3-4
L#3 DoublesVirginia Oconnell / Tracie Watts vs XIAOZHEN LIN / Lei Wang1-6, 1-6
2025-10-01vs Team 4 Combo Mambo 6.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBernadett Damico / Pin Satjayakorn vs Stephanie Frauen / Michelle Tenhaeff2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKimberly Pedersen / Julie Powers vs TOBI PARK / Betsy Payne6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJohanne Maher / Tracie Watts vs HEATHER HUGHES / Tara Jefferson3-6, 2-6
2025-09-26vs Team 2 Break PointLost 02
L#1 DoublesPauline Tsai / Pin Satjayakorn vs Marcy Busch / Olga Minsky2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJohanne Maher / Julie Powers vs Karyn DeVito / Melanie Watermeyer1-6, 0-6
2025-09-20vs Team 15 Net NinjasWon 21
W#1 DoublesPauline Tsai / Stephanie Paduano vs Theresa Jones / Anna Monaghan7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTapleigh Niethamer / Julie Powers vs Lena Ferris / Mary Schopper6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKimberly Pedersen / Tracie Watts vs KERSTIN DEMKO / Kate Trask2-6, 3-6
2025-09-13vs Team 13 WeComboLost 02
L#2 DoublesTapleigh Niethamer / Pin Satjayakorn vs Shelley Que / Vicky Bach2-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesBernadett Damico / Karen Jin vs Junhui Liu / Xiaoli Liang2-6, 7-6
2025-09-06vs Team 11 Serves You RightLost 03
L#1 DoublesTapleigh Niethamer / Pauline Tsai vs Judy OConnor / Kai Geji3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBernadett Damico / Kimberly Pedersen vs Sara Magner / Sophie Lockerby6-7, 1-2
L#3 DoublesJohanne Maher / Stephanie Paduano vs Eve Pandit / Meredith Huddle2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Combo 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Tapleigh Niethamer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.03
Stephanie Paduano
published
3.02
Pin Satjayakorn
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.01
Pauline Tsai
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.89
Karen Jin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.85
Bernadett Damico
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.82
Virginia Oconnell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.80
Camille Flint
published 3
2.72
Julie Powers
published
2.69
Kimberly Pedersen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.61
Johanne Maher
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.42
Tracie Watts
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Jin + Tapleigh Niethamer5271% games+15.5% vs expected
Stephanie Paduano + Virginia Oconnell2648% games+5.0% vs expected
Karen Jin + Pauline Tsai9457% games+2.8% vs expected
Bernadett Damico + Virginia Oconnell2347% games−0.1% vs expected
Karen Jin + Bernadett Damico2541% games−0.1% vs expected
Karen Jin + Virginia Oconnell3352% gamesnot enough data
Pauline Tsai + Virginia Oconnell4170% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Pedersen + Julie Powers134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Tapleigh Niethamer
31W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.09
Stephanie Paduano
19W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.03
3
Pin Satjayakorn
13W–24L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.02
3
Pauline Tsai
29W–24L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Karen Jin
47W–51L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Bernadett Damico
20W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Virginia Oconnell
26W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Camille Flint
3W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.80
Julie Powers
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Kimberly Pedersen
51W–77L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Johanne Maher
15W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
2.61
Tracie Watts
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.