Teams

Martin/Knoxville

2026 Combo 18 & Over- Knoxville · 6.5 Women Combo Doubles

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 20 4:30 PM
Tyson Family Tennis Center
Sep 27 4:30 PM
Tyson Family Tennis Center
Oct 4 4:30 PM
Tyson Family Tennis Center
2026-09-08vs GomesSpurgin/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmanda Martin / Jen Rose vs Carolina Lyngh / Ashtyn Wright1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLora Boruff / Mary Hutchinson vs Laura Spurgin / Katie Linginfelter3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAnn Brady / Ginger Arthur vs Laura Warrick / Whitney Gooch6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2026-08-30vs NuyenNiethammer/KnoxvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesAngie Epps / Sydney van Hook-Hurst vs Heather Ridenour / Eda Pratt2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLibby Hicks / Michelle Wakefield vs Jamie Nuyen / Meredith Buckner1-6, 1-6
2026-08-25vs Open/KnoxvilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmanda Martin / Ginger Arthur vs Allison Demilio / Rebecca Villalba6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAngie Epps / Monica Warren vs Katie Warden / Hilary Brooks6-4, 7-5
2026-08-23vs LandryCook/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnna Taylor / Michelle Wakefield vs Sarah Scott / Sarah Newell7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMary Hutchinson / Lora Boruff vs Brooke Thurman / Ashli Christen5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAnn Brady / Missy Moore vs Caroline Khoury / Krista McIntosh6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women Combo Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Angie Epps
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.01
Ann Brady
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.84
Ginger Arthur
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.74
Katherine Goodner
published
2.64
Jen Rose
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.43
Libby Hicks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.34
Lora Boruff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Michelle Wakefield
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ginger Arthur + Jen Rose9456% games+6.1% vs expected
Lora Boruff + Libby Hicks1440% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Angie Epps
16W–46L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Ann Brady
8W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Ginger Arthur
42W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
2.84
Katherine Goodner
10W–11L career · no lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
Jen Rose
50W–36L career · 1 line in 2026
14%86%<1%
2.64
Libby Hicks
7W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
71%29%<1%
2.43
Lora Boruff
7W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
2.34
Michelle Wakefield
2W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.