Teams

White/Memphis

2026 Combo 18 & Over - Memphis · 7.5 18 & Over Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-27vs Goetsch/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesWhitney Hayes / Shanna Eason vs Candace Browning / Cheryl Ellis6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesHaden Kane / Mary Trotz vs Tammy Chapman / Brooke Robinson5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAshley Wallace / Susan Knight vs Terri Smith / Louisa Bowie6-4, 7-6
2026-08-20vs Martin/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesLil Rudd / Stephanie White vs Christine Woods / Julia Blanche4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesWhitney Hayes / Elizabeth Langley vs Missy Gulick / Carolyn Santos6-7, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHaden Kane / Susan Knight vs Abby Barnett / Debbie Carey4-6, 3-6
2026-08-13vs Bender/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesAshley Wallace / Stephanie White vs Kelly Gill / Abby Spann3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesHaden Kane / Susan Knight vs Deise Berger / JoAnn Cooper4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesWhitney Hayes / Shanna Eason vs Taylor Bender / Lori Jones3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Whitney Hayes
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.66
Haden Kane
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.60
Lil Rudd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Shanna Eason
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.47
Ashley Wallace
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.31
Mary Trotz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Kim Battaile
published
3.15
Sara Yarrow
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shanna Eason + Mary Trotz10361% games+7.2% vs expected
Lil Rudd + Ashley Wallace3349% games+5.6% vs expected
Sara Yarrow + Mary Trotz5353% games−6.6% vs expected
Kim Battaile + Shanna Eason4159% gamesnot enough data
Kim Battaile + Sara Yarrow224 matchesnot enough data
Haden Kane + Whitney Hayes303 matchesnot enough data
Haden Kane + Ashley Wallace123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Whitney Hayes
20W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
Haden Kane
15W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
Lil Rudd
17W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.60
Shanna Eason
49W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
4
Ashley Wallace
16W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
3.47
Mary Trotz
26W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Kim Battaile
13W–13L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17
Sara Yarrow
12W–18L career · no lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.