Teams

Ehly/Trull

2025 Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over · Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.80 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-20vs WoffordLost 01
L#1 DoublesVictoria Ehly / Lori Trull vs Cynthia Wofford / Kathy Coyle2-6, 1-6
2025-07-10vs HuntingtonLost 01
L#2 DoublesLadonna Griffith-Lesesne / TAMBRA BURKE-LEIZEAR vs Lynn Hoffman / Stephanie Ruskin2-6, 0-6
2025-07-06vs WoffordLost 01
L#2 DoublesVictoria Ehly / Beth Flaherty vs Kathy Coyle / Cynthia Wofford1-6, 1-6
2025-06-29vs HuntingtonLost 02
L#2 DoublesTAMBRA BURKE-LEIZEAR / Victoria Ehly vs Patricia Lopez / Stephanie Ruskin4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLadonna Griffith-Lesesne / Cathy Hoffman vs JENNIFER JOY / Martha Whitty1-6, 2-6
2025-06-21vs WoffordLost 01
L#3 DoublesLadonna Griffith-Lesesne / Cathy Hoffman vs Sandra Ingley / Cornelia Wikar3-6, 2-6
2025-06-08vs WoffordLost 01
L#2 DoublesTAMBRA BURKE-LEIZEAR / Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne vs Cynthia Wofford / Teresa Taylor2-6, 3-6
2025-05-20vs WoffordLost 02
L#1 DoublesVictoria Ehly / Lori Trull vs Teresa Taylor / Cynthia Wofford3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Flaherty / Virginia Umberger vs Kathy Coyle / Karin Mottus5-7, 0-6
2025-05-17vs HuntingtonLost 01
L#1 DoublesVictoria Ehly / Beth Flaherty vs DIANE CASANOVA / Jill Huntington5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Lori Trull
published
2.86
Victoria Ehly
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.60
Virginia Umberger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Beth Flaherty
published 3
2.39
Cathy Hoffman
published 2.5
2.32
Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.21
Lori Connors-Tadros
published
Janessa Lidge
published
Virginia Haley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Victoria Ehly + Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Trull
20W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Victoria Ehly
32W–46L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
2.86
3
Virginia Umberger
39W–36L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Beth Flaherty
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
2.5
Cathy Hoffman
2W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%79%21%
2.39
2.5
Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne
39W–85L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.32
Lori Connors-Tadros
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.21
Janessa Lidge
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Virginia Haley
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.