Teams

Sherwood Starlets

2026 SoCal Doubles 18&Over -- WEEKDAY WOMEN · Ventura Women 3.0 WD

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Ventura Women 3.0 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Siao Greene
published 3
2.90
2.89
Mariam Brown
published 3
2.88
Liat Gerszt
published
2.87
Melissa Hariton
published
2.83
Kimberly Lovi
published
2.81
Susan Muzzonigro
published
2.81
Khani Pathmalingam
published
2.79
Hollis Lanson
published
2.66
Connie Mundell
published 3
2.64
Beth Ginzinger
published 3
2.46
Lindsey Hansen
published
Elisabeth Jones
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Hariton + Mariam Brown7360% games+6.1% vs expected
Mariam Brown + Siao Greene7259% games+5.6% vs expected
Eileen Kakoyiannis + Siao Greene5160% gamesnot enough data
Eileen Kakoyiannis + Melissa Hariton224 matchesnot enough data
Eileen Kakoyiannis + Mariam Brown404 matchesnot enough data
Hollis Lanson + Kimberly Lovi404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Siao Greene
36W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.17
3
Eileen Kakoyiannis
116W–91L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
2.90
3
Mariam Brown
48W–37L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
Liat Gerszt
7W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
2.88
Melissa Hariton
22W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.87
Kimberly Lovi
5W–1L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Susan Muzzonigro
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%9%
2.81
Khani Pathmalingam
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Hollis Lanson
5W–2L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Connie Mundell
1W–5L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
3
Beth Ginzinger
4W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.64
Lindsey Hansen
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.46
Elisabeth Jones
64W–80L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.