Teams

NOHO Hot Shots

2025 40 & Over Little State · Ladies 3.5 Flight

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-06-07vs San Antonio-Friday's FaultWon 40
W#1 DoublesBetsy Lyman / Kristen DeLange vs Cassie Villegas / Bettina Walker6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTina Weber vs Miranda Hoffpauir6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAimee Shepherd / Lisa Arvizu vs Kelly Horne / Robin Kozub6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCarrie Navarre-Myers / Julie Long vs Elaine Covert / Karen Smith6-4, 6-4
2025-06-06vs Valley Mission DebbieLost 13
L#1 DoublesBetsy Lyman / Kristen DeLange vs Deborah Gomez / Claudia Campoya4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMary Lupe Arana vs Jacqueline Abisad6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAimee Shepherd / Lisa Arvizu vs Veronica Tellez / Dalia Sanchez4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRuby Behnke / Jeanette Vargas vs Muriel Garcia / Vanessa Sarabia6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ladies 3.5 Flight have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Carrie Navarre-Myers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.64
Mary Lupe Arana
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.52
Lisa Arvizu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Kristen DeLange
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Ruby Behnke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Betsy Lyman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Beverley Lastinger
published 3.5
3.27
Aimee Shepherd
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Tina Weber
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.15
Jeanette Vargas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Yevgeniya Simpson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Betsy Lyman + Kristen DeLange9166% games+7.0% vs expected
Aimee Shepherd + Lisa Arvizu314 matchesnot enough data
Ruby Behnke + Yevgeniya Simpson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carrie Navarre-Myers
11W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.64
Mary Lupe Arana
14W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Lisa Arvizu
19W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
Kristen DeLange
16W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.46
Ruby Behnke
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Betsy Lyman
17W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Beverley Lastinger
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Aimee Shepherd
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Tina Weber
18W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Jeanette Vargas
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
Yevgeniya Simpson
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.