Teams

Trail Blazers

2023 NOVA Combo Men · NOVA Combo 7.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-08Lost 01
L#1 DoublesIvan Kozliak / Ryan Rohn vs Gautham Swaminathan / Rahul Sharma5-7, 2-6
2023-09-06Lost 01
L#2 DoublesEyad Abuhamda / Helmut Klemperer vs Mike Metzger / Blake Taylor7-6, 1-6
2023-08-28vs Team CourtmastersSplit 11
W#2 DoublesShawn Tith / Eyad Abuhamda vs Sanjivan Sivapiragasam / Jing Gu6-2, 6-5
L#3 DoublesAkash Bansal / Chris Bokel vs Aaron Klinge / Sean Klinge2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-08-25vs Team ChallengersWon 10
W#2 DoublesIvan Kozliak / Shawn Tith vs Kursat Yavuz / Tezcan Inanlar2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-08-18vs Team CourtmastersWon 21
W#1 DoublesJason Pallady / Ryan Rohn vs Yong Jae Lee / Jorge Prieto Choy7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJose Ricardo Cornista / Helmut Klemperer vs Chandra Shekhar Ramshetti / Vijay Kalanadhabhatta6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJuan Mayorga / Eyad Abuhamda vs Weiling Tan / Gautham Swaminathan2-6, 6-6
2023-08-16Won 10
W#3 DoublesChris Bokel / Akash Bansal vs Blake Taylor / John Wolosuk7-5, 6-2
2023-08-11vs Team CourtmastersLost 02
L#1 DoublesBen Moss / Ivan Kozliak vs Sai Maddi / JANAK MEHTA3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJuan Mayorga / Chris Bokel vs Gautham Swaminathan / Sean Klinge5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Combo 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Helmut Klemperer
published 4
3.70
Eyad Abuhamda
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Ryan Rohn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Jason Pallady
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Ivan Kozliak
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.54
Chris Bokel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Jose Ricardo Cornista
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Ben Moss
published 3.5
THUC NGUYEN
published 3.5
3.01
David Flam
published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Helmut Klemperer
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Eyad Abuhamda
141W–95L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Ryan Rohn
242W–218L career · 2 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Jason Pallady
85W–62L career · 1 line in 2023
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Ivan Kozliak
300W–288L career · 8 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Chris Bokel
83W–32L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Jose Ricardo Cornista
40W–21L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Ben Moss
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
THUC NGUYEN
45W–43L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
David Flam
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.