Teams

An.Pershke40A

2025 Capital Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-19Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAnne Enberg / Ann Pershke vs Erika Miller / Elizabeth Thompson6-0, 4-6, 0-1
2025-05-06vs Li.Taylor40AWon 10
W#2 DoublesJosie Tattersall / Anne Enberg vs Jennifer Bissette / DEBRA LAUGHERY6-3, 6-3
2025-04-22Won 10
W#2 DoublesEmily Tripp / Anne Enberg vs Julie Clark / Laura Stanziale6-2, 7-5
2025-04-08vs Ki.Meeker40AWon 20
W#2 DoublesAnn Pershke / Anne Enberg vs Jennifer Lawrence / Elizabeth Thompson6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKatherine Rostick / Jill Cramer vs Elizabeth Preston / Amanda Zukowski6-4, 6-3
2025-03-18vs Je.Wolborsky40A3.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Cantando / Katherine Rostick vs Teri O'Neill / Ange Urlaub7-6, 6-2
2025-03-11vs Je.Kaulback40ALost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Cantando / Katherine Rostick vs Kristen Levine / Jennifer Kaulback4-6, 6-7
2025-03-04vs Ju.Shuey40ALost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Bornhofen / Katherine Rostick vs Molly Clark / Sharon Lambe1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Anne Enberg
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.89
Amy Cantando
published 3
2.77
Katherine Rostick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.77
Monica Udell
published
2.70
Karen Bornhofen
published
2.68
Ann Pershke
published 3
2.55
Josie Tattersall
published
2.54
Kathleen Malik
published
2.49
Lisa Pace
published
2.38
Ellen Nespeca
published
2.37
Misty Howell
published
Jenna Cobb
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katherine Rostick + Karen Bornhofen134 matchesnot enough data
Amy Cantando + Karen Bornhofen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Anne Enberg
26W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Amy Cantando
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Katherine Rostick
55W–62L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
2.77
Monica Udell
11W–19L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Karen Bornhofen
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Ann Pershke
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
2.68
Josie Tattersall
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.55
Kathleen Malik
0W–10L career · no lines in 2025
38%61%<1%
2.54
Lisa Pace
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.49
Ellen Nespeca
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.38
Misty Howell
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.37
Jenna Cobb
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Elizabeth Phillips
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.