Teams

LCulp (Park Road)

2025 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 6.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-01vs MWolf/Shelley (WSRC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDebbie Glass / Sara DeVries vs Sherry Teat / Lisa Leake5-7, 4-6
2025-09-24vs BBaker (Queens)Split 11
W#1 DoublesLauren Culp / Sara DeVries vs Brittany Baker / Kathy Kopec6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAnne Morgan / Julie Merkelson Dermack vs Lea Williams / Morgan Lee0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHailey Foreman / Julie Merkelson Dermack vs Mayela Magur / Shruti Chandra3-6, 2-6
2025-09-03vs KSmith (Park Road)Won 10
W#1 DoublesLauren Culp / Sara DeVries vs Molly Lynch / Kendall Smith6-2, 6-3
2025-08-20vs JGentile (WSRC)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSara DeVries / Anne Morgan vs Jamie Zarambo / Brandi Hoover4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAlli Petersen / Julie Merkelson Dermack vs Kathleen O'Donnell / Kristyn Atkins0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Cori Niemann
published 3
2.71
Sara DeVries
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.67
Lauren Culp
published
2.61
Hailey Foreman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.30
Alli Petersen
published 2.5
2.30
Madison Stimson
published
2.29
Debbie Glass
published 2.5
2.14
Julie Merkelson Dermack
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara DeVries + Lauren Culp1742% games+4.1% vs expected
Debbie Glass + Madison Stimson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cori Niemann
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Sara DeVries
30W–54L career · 7 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Lauren Culp
1W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%11%89%
2.67
Hailey Foreman
14W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
2.5
Alli Petersen
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.30
Madison Stimson
14W–15L career · no lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.30
2.5
Debbie Glass
5W–7L career · type A · no lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.29
2.5
Julie Merkelson Dermack
4W–39L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.