Teams

Lynne's Team

2022 Adult 70 and Over League · 6.5 W

7 players · average NTRP 3.08 / EAST HAWAII

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-12-23vs Meg's TeamWon 21
W#1 DoublesBarbara Nagata / Ipolani Wright vs Amy Brotzman / Donna Duryea6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesGloria Gomez / Jane Markham vs Jane Iida / Meg Saunders2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJeanne Harano-Hernandez / Aiko Mitchel vs Ellen Higa / Donna Moore6-1, 6-1
2022-12-18vs Larie's TeamWon 21
L#1 DoublesGloria Gomez / Lynne Miura vs Lucy K Makuakane / Elaine Reed1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBarbara Nagata / Ipolani Wright vs KATHLEEN OLDFATHER / June Taguma7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJeanne Harano-Hernandez / Aiko Mitchel vs Charlotte Etling / Eunice Hashimoto6-2, 6-2
2022-12-11vs Meg's TeamLost 12
W#1 DoublesAiko Mitchel / Jeanne Harano-Hernandez vs Meg Saunders / Ellen Higa6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJane Markham / Ipolani Wright vs Mildred Kaneshiro / Anne Gleason1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLynne Miura / Gloria Gomez vs Jane Iida / Donna Moore4-6, 3-6
2022-12-04vs Larie's TeamWon 21
L#1 DoublesJane Markham / Lynne Miura vs Carolyn Goff / June Taguma6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJeanne Harano-Hernandez / Aiko Mitchel vs Eunice Hashimoto / Elaine Reed6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBarbara Nagata / Ipolani Wright vs Charlotte Etling / KATHLEEN OLDFATHER6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Ipolani Wright
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Jeanne Harano-Hernandez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Barbara Nagata
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Aiko Mitchel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Gloria Gomez
published 2.5
2.23
Lynne Miura
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jane Markham
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aiko Mitchel + Jeanne Harano-Hernandez8269% games+18.2% vs expected
Ipolani Wright + Barbara Nagata303 matchesnot enough data
Ipolani Wright + Gloria Gomez033 matchesnot enough data
Lynne Miura + Aiko Mitchel123 matchesnot enough data
Lynne Miura + Jeanne Harano-Hernandez123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ipolani Wright
44W–51L career · 4 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Jeanne Harano-Hernandez
68W–96L career · 4 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Barbara Nagata
30W–20L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Aiko Mitchel
54W–76L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.71
2.5
Gloria Gomez
16W–50L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Lynne Miura
36W–83L career · 3 lines in 2022
98%2%<1%
2.23
Jane Markham
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.